Radlanski Ralf J, Renz Herbert, Reulen Anna
Department of Experimental Dentistry, Benjamin Franklin University Hospital, Free University, Berlin, Germany.
J Orofac Orthop. 2003 Jul;64(4):284-92. doi: 10.1007/s00056-003-0311-x.
During orthodontic treatment with a multiband appliance, enamel decalcifications and periodontal irritation may occur due to inevitable plaque retention. Besides the band itself, non-cemented gaps between tooth and band constitute a problem that has not yet been investigated from quantitative aspects.
In this in vitro study, the cement distribution beneath the orthodontic band was investigated on 48 identical transparent resin replicas of upper molars and lower molars, respectively. The replicas with the cemented orthodontic bands were divided into buccal, distal, oral, and mesial segments so that the inner surfaces of the bands could undergo morphometric analysis for areas not covered with cement. Two different molar bands (Dentaform Snap by Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany, and "Washbon" by Ormco, Orange, CA, USA), and two glass-ionomer cements (OptiBand by Ormco and Ultra Band-Lok Blue by GAC, Gräfelfing, Germany) were used. In this way, 8 test series with twelve specimens each were performed.
Not one cement-band combination was without defects in the cement film, with poorer cement flow properties being observed at the upper than at the lower molars. In general, fewer defects were recorded in the occlusal than in the cervical areas. Overall, the buccal surfaces yielded the best results, and the mesial surfaces the poorest.
Since defects in the cement film have so far been unavoidable, the indication for orthodontic treatment with a multiband appliance must continue to be strict. Unless accompanying professional prophylactic care coupled with optimal oral hygiene is ensured, multiband appliances should be used with great caution.
在使用多带矫治器进行正畸治疗期间,由于不可避免的菌斑滞留,可能会发生牙釉质脱矿和牙周刺激。除了矫治带本身,牙齿与矫治带之间未粘结的间隙也是一个问题,尚未从定量方面进行研究。
在这项体外研究中,分别在48个相同的上颌磨牙和下颌磨牙透明树脂模型上研究了正畸矫治带下方的粘结剂分布情况。将粘结有正畸矫治带的模型分为颊侧、远中、舌侧和近中部分,以便对矫治带内表面未被粘结剂覆盖的区域进行形态计量分析。使用了两种不同的磨牙矫治带(德国伊辛根的登泰克公司生产的Dentaform Snap和美国加利福尼亚州奥兰治的奥美科公司生产的“Washbon”)以及两种玻璃离子粘结剂(奥美科公司的OptiBand和德国格拉费林的GAC公司生产的Ultra Band-Lok Blue)。通过这种方式,进行了8个测试系列,每个系列有12个样本。
没有一种粘结剂-矫治带组合的粘结剂膜没有缺陷,上颌磨牙处的粘结剂流动性比下颌磨牙处的差。一般来说,咬合面的缺陷比颈部区域少。总体而言,颊侧表面的结果最好,近中表面最差。
由于迄今为止粘结剂膜中的缺陷不可避免,使用多带矫治器进行正畸治疗的指征必须继续严格。除非能确保伴随专业的预防护理以及最佳的口腔卫生,否则应非常谨慎地使用多带矫治器。