Maccoby Eleanor E, Lewis Catherine C
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, CA 94305-2130, USA.
Child Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug;74(4):1069-75. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00592.
Commentary is provided on 2 papers published in this issue, which suggest some risks in nonmaternal or out-of-home care (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD] Early Child Care Research Network, this issue; Watamura, Donzella, Alwin, & Gunnar, this issue). In light of the findings, 2 child care policy options are examined: first, support for in-home care in the early years; and second, changes in the nature of out-of-home care. From ethnographic and experimental research, it is argued that out-of-home pre-elementary care can contribute positively to social development if it emphasizes (a) children's attachment to school and peer group, (b) constructivist rather than didactic learning, (c) intrinsic and internalized motivation, and (4) group structures that support social development.
本期发表了两篇论文并附有评论,这些论文指出了非母亲照料或家庭外照料存在的一些风险(美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所[NICHD]早期儿童保育研究网络,本期;瓦塔穆拉、唐泽拉、阿尔文和冈纳,本期)。根据这些研究结果,探讨了两种儿童保育政策选择:第一,早年对家庭内照料的支持;第二,家庭外照料性质的改变。从人种志和实验研究来看,有人认为,如果家庭外学前照料强调以下几点,就能对社会发展产生积极贡献:(a)儿童对学校和同龄群体的依恋;(b)建构主义而非说教式学习;(c)内在和内化的动机;以及(4)支持社会发展的群体结构。