Luis C A, Loewenstein D A, Acevedo A, Barker W W, Duara R
Wien Center for Alzheimer's Disease and Memory Disorders, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL 33143, USA.
Neurology. 2003 Aug 26;61(4):438-44. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000080366.90234.7f.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), an intermediate state between normal aging and dementia, is characterized by acquired cognitive deficits, without significant decline in functional activities of daily living. Studies conducted on MCI have introduced new concepts regarding the possible distinctions between normal and pathologic aging of the brain. Neuroimaging and genetic testing have aided in the identification of individuals at increased risk for dementia. The measurement of change in cognitive and functional status in MCI remains challenging, because it requires instruments that are more sensitive and specific than those considered adequate for research in dementia. The authors provide an overview of the many methods that have been used to study MCI and directions that may help achieve greater uniformity in methodology. Considerable heterogeneity exists in research methodology used to study the epidemiology, thresholds for cognitive and functional impairment, rate of progression, risk factors, and defining subtypes of MCI. This article emphasizes the need for uniformity in the use of 1) appropriate and sensitive neuropsychological and functional measures to diagnose MCI, 2) reliable methods to determine progression or improvement of cognitive impairment, and 3) instruments in epidemiologic studies to establish population estimates for diverse ethnic and cultural groups. Greater consensus is needed to standardize definitions and research methodology for MCI, so as to make future studies more comparable and more useful for designing effective treatment strategies.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)是正常衰老与痴呆之间的中间状态,其特征是获得性认知缺陷,而日常生活功能活动无明显下降。针对MCI开展的研究引入了有关大脑正常衰老与病理性衰老可能差异的新概念。神经影像学和基因检测有助于识别痴呆风险增加的个体。测量MCI患者认知和功能状态的变化仍然具有挑战性,因为这需要比用于痴呆研究的仪器更敏感、更特异的工具。作者概述了用于研究MCI的多种方法以及可能有助于在方法上实现更大一致性的方向。在用于研究MCI的流行病学、认知和功能损害阈值、进展率、危险因素以及定义MCI亚型的研究方法中存在相当大的异质性。本文强调在使用以下方面需要保持一致:1)用于诊断MCI的适当且敏感的神经心理学和功能测量方法;2)确定认知障碍进展或改善的可靠方法;3)在流行病学研究中用于为不同种族和文化群体建立人群估计值的工具。需要达成更大的共识来规范MCI的定义和研究方法,以便使未来的研究更具可比性,并且对设计有效的治疗策略更有用。