• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Transradial coronary angiography and intervention.

作者信息

Ahmed Waqar H

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, PO Box 9862, Jeddah 21159, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2003 Aug;24(8):850-3.

PMID:12939670
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transradial cardiac catheterization promises fewer access site complications and improved patient comfort due to immediate ambulation. However, the use of miniaturized systems and the presence of a steep learning curve have discouraged the acceptance of transradial catheterization. The purpose of this study was to assess the applicability and learning curve of transradial catheterization in the Saudi population for operators without prior experience in this approach.

METHODS

The study was performed at the King Fahd Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between June 2001 and January 2003. Right radial artery cannulation was performed and standard 5 French (F) femoral curve catheters for angiography and standard 6F guiding catheters were used for intervention. The first 101 patients comprised group 1 and the subsequent 101 patients comprised group 2.

RESULTS

Two hundred and two patients underwent transradial catheterization (diagnostic alone in 49%, intervention alone in 10%, and diagnostic plus intervention in 41%). The procedure was successful in 191 patients (95%). The success rate was higher (99% versus 90%, p=0.013), and the mean diagnostic catheterization time was lower (28 versus 20 minutes, p=0.013) in group 2 patients compared with group one patients. There were no vascular or ischemic complications.

CONCLUSION

Transradial catheterization is safe and feasible for diagnostic and interventional procedures. With experience, the success rates and the procedural times have both improved.

摘要

相似文献

1
Transradial coronary angiography and intervention.
Saudi Med J. 2003 Aug;24(8):850-3.
2
A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的随机对比研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Nov;2(11):1047-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.016.
3
Transradial approach for coronary procedures: initial experience and results.冠状动脉介入手术的桡动脉入路:初步经验与结果
G Ital Cardiol. 1998 Jul;28(7):767-73.
4
Repeated transradial catheterization: feasibility, efficacy, and safety.经桡动脉重复导管插入术:可行性、疗效及安全性
Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Dec 1;41(6):575-8. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-4000. eCollection 2014 Dec.
5
Feasibility of transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影术及血管成形术在中国患者中的可行性
Hong Kong Med J. 2006 Apr;12(2):108-14.
6
[Transradial approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty: initial experience and learning curve].[经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉造影和血管成形术:初步经验及学习曲线]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2003 Feb;56(2):152-9. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(03)76839-0.
7
Transulnar versus transradial artery approach for coronary angioplasty: the PCVI-CUBA study.经尺动脉与经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉血管成形术:PCVI-CUBA研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 May;67(5):711-20. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20679.
8
Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures.在尝试对双侧桡动脉进行冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时,股动脉入路转换率较低:一项对1826例连续手术的研究。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Sep;22(9):391-7.
9
The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗对上肢功能的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.025. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
10
5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing.使用传统导管和球囊辅助追踪技术的5F无鞘经桡动脉心脏导管插入术;一种缩小尺寸的新方法。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;18(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedure-Related Access Site Pain Multimodal Management following Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial.经皮心脏介入术后与操作相关的入路部位疼痛的多模式管理:一项随机对照试验。
Pain Res Manag. 2022 Jan 24;2022:6102793. doi: 10.1155/2022/6102793. eCollection 2022.
2
Predictive Factors for Access-Site Pain Chronicity after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Radial Artery Access.经桡动脉入路行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后穿刺部位疼痛慢性化的预测因素。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Nov 16;2020:8887499. doi: 10.1155/2020/8887499. eCollection 2020.
3
Revealing the impact of local access-site complications and upper extremity dysfunction post transradial percutaneous coronary procedures.
揭示经桡动脉入路局部并发症和上肢功能障碍对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响。
Neth Heart J. 2015 Nov;23(11):514-24. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0747-9.
4
Comparison between intra-venous versus intra-arterial heparin during transradial coronary artery catheterization.
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2014 Jul;26(3):129-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 18.