Carr Jennifer Z, Schmidt Aaron M, Ford J Kevin, DeShon Richard P
Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):605-19. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.605.
Although workplace climate has been extensively studied, the research has not led to firm conclusions as to its relationship with individual level work outcomes. The authors used C. Ostroff's (1993) taxonomy to organize dimensions labeled as workplace climate and then used meta-analytic techniques to test a path analytic model. The model posited that climate affects individual level outcomes through its impact on underlying cognitive and affective states. An extensive literature search yielded 51 empirical studies with 70 samples. The results suggest that the 3 higher order facets of climate (affective, cognitive, and instrumental) affected individual level outcomes of job performance, psychological well-being, and withdrawal through their impact on organizational commitment and job satisfaction.
尽管工作场所氛围已得到广泛研究，但关于其与个体层面工作成果之间的关系，研究尚未得出确凿结论。作者采用C. 奥斯特罗夫（1993）的分类法来组织被标记为工作场所氛围的维度，然后运用元分析技术来检验一个路径分析模型。该模型假定，氛围通过对潜在认知和情感状态的影响来影响个体层面的成果。广泛的文献检索产生了51项实证研究，包含70个样本。结果表明，氛围的3个高阶方面（情感、认知和工具性）通过对组织承诺和工作满意度的影响，进而影响了工作绩效、心理健康和离职等个体层面的成果。
