• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

问责、尊重与道德气候调查(CARES):一项组织气候调查的开发与验证

Climate of Accountability, Respect, and Ethics Survey (CARES): development and validation of an organizational climate survey.

作者信息

Martinson Brian C, Smallfield Jarvis, Magley Vicki J, Thrush Carol R, Gunsalus C K

机构信息

Retired, Saint Paul, MI, United States.

Department of Management, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Feb 25;10:1516726. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1516726. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/frma.2025.1516726
PMID:40070800
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11894455/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This research describes the development and validation of the CARES Climate Survey, a 22-item measure designed to assess interpersonal dimensions of work-unit climates. Dimensions of work-unit climates are identified through work-unit member perceptions and include civility, interpersonal accountability, conflict resolution, and institutional harassment responsiveness.

METHODS

Two samples ( = 1,384; = 868) of academic researchers, including one from the North American membership of the American Geophysical Union (AGU), and one from a large research-intensive university, responded to the CARES and additional measures via an online survey.

RESULTS

We demonstrate content validity of the CARES measure and confirm structural validity through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses which yielded four dimensions of interpersonal climate. In addition, we confirm the CARES internal reliability, construct validity, and excellent sub-group invariance.

CONCLUSIONS

The CARES is a brief, psychometrically sound instrument that can be used by researchers, institutional leaders, and other practitioners to assess interpersonal climates in organizational work-units.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This is the first study to develop and validate such a measure of interpersonal climates specifically in research-intensive organizations, using rigorous psychometric methods, grounded in both theory and prior research on work-unit climates.

摘要

背景

本研究描述了CARES气候调查的开发与验证过程,这是一项包含22个条目的测量工具,旨在评估工作单位氛围的人际维度。工作单位氛围的维度通过工作单位成员的感知来确定,包括文明礼貌、人际问责、冲突解决以及机构对骚扰行为的应对能力。

方法

两组学术研究人员样本(n = 1384;n = 868)参与了调查,一组来自美国地球物理联盟(AGU)的北美会员,另一组来自一所大型研究型大学,他们通过在线调查对CARES及其他测量工具进行了回应。

结果

我们证明了CARES测量工具的内容效度,并通过探索性和验证性因素分析确认了其结构效度,分析得出了人际氛围的四个维度。此外,我们还确认了CARES的内部信度、结构效度以及出色的子群体不变性。

结论

CARES是一种简短且心理测量学上可靠的工具,研究人员、机构领导及其他从业者可使用它来评估组织工作单位中的人际氛围。

原创性/价值:这是第一项专门针对研究密集型组织开发并验证此类人际氛围测量工具的研究,采用了严谨的心理测量方法,以工作单位氛围的理论和先前研究为基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae1f/11894455/fe75aa41576c/frma-10-1516726-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae1f/11894455/fe75aa41576c/frma-10-1516726-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae1f/11894455/fe75aa41576c/frma-10-1516726-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Climate of Accountability, Respect, and Ethics Survey (CARES): development and validation of an organizational climate survey.问责、尊重与道德气候调查(CARES):一项组织气候调查的开发与验证
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Feb 25;10:1516726. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1516726. eCollection 2025.
2
The predictive validity of safety climate.安全氛围的预测效度。
J Safety Res. 2007;38(5):511-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.07.001. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
3
Development and validation of the.. 的制定与验证。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2024 Sep 10;37(3):311-325. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.02344. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
4
Initial Results from the Survey of Organizational Research Climates (SOuRCe) in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.美国退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统组织研究氛围调查(SOuRCe)的初步结果
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0151571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151571. eCollection 2016.
5
Relational Climate in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation.工作场所中的关系氛围:维度、测量与验证
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 13;11:85. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00085. eCollection 2020.
6
Developmental stages associated with organizational learning in hospitals: An instrument development study.与医院组织学习相关的发展阶段:一种工具开发研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Nov;78(11):3662-3672. doi: 10.1111/jan.15262. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Hospital nurses' perceptions of the ethical climate of their work setting.医院护士对其工作环境道德氛围的认知。
Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(4):345-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1998.tb01331.x.
8
Development and validation of safety climate scales for mobile remote workers using utility/electrical workers as exemplar.开发并验证使用电力/电工作为范例的移动远程工作者安全氛围量表。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Oct;59:76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.030. Epub 2013 May 10.
9
Assessing the organizational context for EBP implementation: the development and validity testing of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS).评估循证实践实施的组织背景:实施氛围量表(ICS)的开发与效度测试。
Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 23;9:157. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0157-1.
10
Development and psychometric testing of the Perceived Organizational Climate Scale for nurses.护士感知组织氛围量表的编制及心理测量学检验。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Oct;78(10):3470-3482. doi: 10.1111/jan.15401. Epub 2022 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating and supporting leadership, management, and mentoring: a framework for catalyzing responsible research and healthy research environments.评估与支持领导力、管理及指导:促进负责任研究与健康研究环境的框架
Front Res Metr Anal. 2025 Jul 1;10:1569524. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1569524. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Leaving academia: PhD attrition and unhealthy research environments.离开学术界:博士流失与不健康的研究环境。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0274976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274976. eCollection 2022.
2
Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting.验证性因子分析和适配优化的测量不变性检验:透明分析计划和报告的教程。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Aug;28(4):905-924. doi: 10.1037/met0000441. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates.
卓越监督:一项培训导师将负责任研究实践传授给博士生的试点研究。
Account Res. 2023 Dec;30(8):574-591. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2022.2071153. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
Ending Sexual Harassment in Science: Designing and Administering a Survey That Can Lead to an Improved Organizational Climate.终结科学界的性骚扰:设计并实施一项能够改善组织氛围的调查
Acad Med. 2022 Mar 1;97(3):364-369. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004491.
5
Work Redesign for the 21st Century: Promising Strategies for Enhancing Worker Well-Being.21 世纪的工作再设计:增强员工福祉的有前景策略。
Am J Public Health. 2021 Oct;111(10):1787-1795. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306283. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
6
Researchers' Perceptions of a Responsible Research Climate: A Multi Focus Group Study.研究人员对负责任研究氛围的看法:一项多焦点组研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3017-3036. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00256-8. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
7
NIH prepares to toughen harassment rules.美国国立卫生研究院准备强化骚扰规定。
Science. 2019 Jun 21;364(6446):1117-1118. doi: 10.1126/science.364.6446.1117.
8
NSF issues sexual harassment policy as NIH promises action.美国国家科学基金会发布性骚扰政策,美国国立卫生研究院承诺采取行动。
Science. 2018 Sep 28;361(6409):1299-1300. doi: 10.1126/science.361.6409.1299.
9
Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC).组织研究氛围调查(SORC)的编制与验证。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):813-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
10
Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices.组织研究氛围调查(SORC)与自我报告的研究实践之间的关系。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):835-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9409-0. Epub 2012 Oct 25.