Gockel Hedwig, Moore Brian C J, Patterson Roy D, Meddis Ray
CNBH, Department of Physiology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EG, England.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Aug;114(2):978-90. doi: 10.1121/1.1593065.
The influence of the degree of envelope modulation and periodicity on the loudness and effectiveness of sounds as forward maskers was investigated. In the first experiment, listeners matched the loudness of complex tones and noise. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz and were filtered into a frequency range from the 10th harmonic to 5000 Hz. The Gaussian noise was filtered in the same way. The components of the complex tones were added either in cosine phase (CPH), giving a large crest factor, or in random phase (RPH), giving a smaller crest factor. For each F0, subjects matched the loudness between all possible stimulus pairs. Six different levels of the fixed stimulus were used, ranging from about 30 dB SPL to about 80 dB SPL in 10-dB steps. Results showed that, at a given overall level, the CPH and the RPH tones were louder than the noise, and that the CPH tone was louder than the RPH tone. The difference in loudness was larger at medium than at low levels and was only slightly reduced by the addition of a noise intended to mask combination tones. The differences in loudness were slightly smaller for the higher than for the lower F0. In the second experiment, the stimuli with the lower F0s were used as forward maskers of a 20-ms sinusoid, presented at various frequencies within the spectral range of the maskers. Results showed that the CPH tone was the least effective forward masker, even though it was the loudest. The differences in effectiveness as forward maskers depended on masker level and signal frequency; in order to produce equal masking, the level of the CPH tone had to be up to 35 dB above that of the RPH tone and the noise. The implications of these results for models of loudness are discussed and a model is presented based on neural activity patterns in the auditory nerve; this predicts the general pattern of loudness matches. It is suggested that the effects observed in the experiments may have been influenced by two factors: cochlear compression and suppression.
研究了包络调制程度和周期性对作为前向掩蔽声的声音响度和掩蔽效果的影响。在第一个实验中,听众匹配了复合音和噪声的响度。这些音调的基频(F0)为62.5或250Hz,并被滤波到从第10谐波到5000Hz的频率范围内。高斯噪声也以相同方式进行滤波。复合音的成分要么以余弦相位(CPH)相加,产生较大的波峰因数,要么以随机相位(RPH)相加,产生较小的波峰因数。对于每个F0,受试者匹配所有可能刺激对之间的响度。使用了六种不同水平的固定刺激,范围从约30dB SPL到约80dB SPL,以10dB步长递增。结果表明,在给定的总水平下,CPH音调和RPH音调比噪声更响亮,并且CPH音调比RPH音调更响亮。响度差异在中等水平比在低水平时更大,并且通过添加旨在掩蔽组合音的噪声仅略有降低。对于较高的F0,响度差异略小于较低的F0。在第二个实验中,将具有较低F0的刺激用作20ms正弦波的前向掩蔽声,该正弦波在掩蔽声的频谱范围内的各种频率下呈现。结果表明,CPH音调是最无效的前向掩蔽声,尽管它是最响亮的。作为前向掩蔽声的有效性差异取决于掩蔽声水平和信号频率;为了产生相等的掩蔽,CPH音调的水平必须比RPH音调和噪声的水平高35dB。讨论了这些结果对响度模型的影响,并提出了一个基于听神经中神经活动模式的模型;这预测了响度匹配的一般模式。有人认为,实验中观察到的效应可能受到两个因素的影响:耳蜗压缩和抑制。