Suppr超能文献

印度南部本地治里地区农村和城市社区的蚊虫问题以及所采用的个人防护措施的类型和成本。

The mosquito problem and type and costs of personal protection measures used in rural and urban communities in Pondicherry region, South India.

作者信息

Snehalatha K S, Ramaiah K D, Vijay Kumar K N, Das P K

机构信息

Vector Control Research Centre (Indian Council of Medical Research), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605006, India.

出版信息

Acta Trop. 2003 Sep;88(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/s0001-706x(03)00155-4.

Abstract

Personal protection measures have become an important tool against mosquito nuisance. The severity of mosquito nuisance and the type and costs of personal protection measures in the Pondicherry region in South India have been investigated, using a structured questionnaire. The number of respondents sampled was 300 in the urban area and 100 in rural areas. 87 and 63% of the urban and rural respondents, respectively, felt that mosquito nuisance was severe in their locality. 83% of the urban and 27% of the rural respondents are aware that mosquitoes transmit diseases and were able to name at least one mosquito-borne disease. All the neighbourhood shops in urban and a majority in rural areas stocked personal protection products. As many as 99.3 and 73% of the urban and rural respondents, respectively, were found to use personal-protection measures during some or all seasons of the year. Mosquito coils were the most widely used measure in both urban and rural areas, followed by vaporising mats in the former and electric fans in the latter areas. 48 and 40% in urban and rural areas, respectively, used personal-protection measures daily. In urban areas 46% used the measures in more than one room. Only a small proportion (3-14%) used bed nets. The average monthly expenditure on the measures was Rupees (Rs.) 62.17 (US$ 1.30) (range: Rs. 0.00-500.00) in urban areas and Rs. 8.03 (US$ 0.17) (range Rs. 0.00-45.00) in rural areas. Annual expenditure on personal protection measures in urban areas amounted to 0.63% of the per capita income. 73.7% of the respondents in urban areas expressed satisfaction with the protective effect of the measures used by them. However, 46.3% of the urban and 15% of the rural respondents felt that the personal-protection measures are harmful to health. Some of the perceived harmful effects are allergy, breathing problems, cough and head ache.

摘要

个人防护措施已成为应对蚊虫滋扰的一项重要工具。通过一份结构化问卷,对印度南部本地治里地区蚊虫滋扰的严重程度以及个人防护措施的类型和成本进行了调查。城市地区抽样的受访者有300人,农村地区有100人。城市和农村受访者分别有87%和63%认为当地蚊虫滋扰严重。城市受访者中有83%、农村受访者中有27%知道蚊子会传播疾病,并且能够说出至少一种蚊媒疾病。城市的所有邻里商店以及农村的大多数商店都有个人防护产品库存。分别有多达99.3%的城市受访者和73%的农村受访者在一年中的某些季节或所有季节使用个人防护措施。蚊香在城市和农村地区都是使用最广泛的措施,其次城市地区是电热蚊香片,农村地区是电风扇。城市和农村地区分别有48%和40%的人每天使用个人防护措施。在城市地区,46%的人在不止一个房间使用这些措施。只有一小部分人(3%-14%)使用蚊帐。这些措施的月平均支出在城市地区为62.17卢比(1.30美元)(范围:0.00-500.00卢比),在农村地区为8.03卢比(0.17美元)(范围:0.00-45.00卢比)。城市地区个人防护措施的年度支出占人均收入的0.63%。城市地区73.7%的受访者对他们所使用措施的防护效果表示满意。然而,城市地区46.3%的受访者和农村地区15%的受访者认为个人防护措施对健康有害。一些被认为的有害影响包括过敏、呼吸问题、咳嗽和头痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验