Legorreta-Soberanis José, Paredes-Solís Sergio, Morales-Pérez Arcadio, Nava-Aguilera Elizabeth, Serrano-de Los Santos Felipe René, Sánchez-Gervacio Belén Madeline, Ledogar Robert J, Cockcroft Anne, Andersson Neil
Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales de la Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Guerrero state, Acapulco, Mexico.
CIETinternational, New York, NY, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4303-y.
Dengue is a serious public health issue that affects households in endemic areas in terms of health and also economically, imposing costs for prevention and treatment of cases. The Camino Verde cluster-randomised controlled trial in Mexico and Nicaragua assessed the impact of evidence-based community engagement in dengue prevention. The Mexican arm of the trial was conducted in 90 randomly selected communities in three coastal regions of Guerrero State. This study reports an analysis of a secondary outcome of the trial: household use of and expenditure on anti-mosquito products. We examined whether the education and mobilisation activities of the trial motivated people to spend less on anti-mosquito products.
We carried out a household questionnaire survey in the trial communities in 2010 (12,312 households) and 2012 (5349 households in intervention clusters, 5142 households in control clusters), including questions about socio-economic status, self-reported dengue illness, and purchase of and expenditure on insecticide anti-mosquito products in the previous month. We examined expenditures on anti-mosquito products at baseline in relation to social vulnerability and we compared use of and expenditures on these products between intervention and control clusters in 2012.
In 2010, 44.2% of 12,312 households reported using anti-mosquito products, with a mean expenditure of USD4.61 per month among those who used them. Socially vulnerable households spent less on the products. In 2012, after the intervention, the proportion of households who purchased anti-mosquito products in the last month was significantly lower in intervention clusters (47.8%; 2503/5293) than in control clusters (53.3%; 2707/5079) (difference - 0.05, 95% CIca -0.100 to -0.010). The mean expenditure on the products, among those households who bought them, was USD6.43; 30.4% in the intervention clusters and 36.7% in the control clusters spent more than this (difference - 0.06, 95% CIca -0.12 to -0.01). These expenditures on anti-mosquito products represent 3.3% and 3.8% respectively of monthly household income for the poorest 10% of the population in 2012.
The Camino Verde community mobilisation intervention, as well as being effective in reducing dengue infections, was effective in reducing household use of and expenditure on insecticide anti-mosquito products.
( ISRCTN27581154 ).
登革热是一个严重的公共卫生问题,在流行地区会对家庭的健康和经济状况产生影响,带来预防和治疗病例的成本。墨西哥和尼加拉瓜的“绿道”整群随机对照试验评估了循证社区参与在登革热预防中的影响。该试验的墨西哥部分在格雷罗州三个沿海地区的90个随机选择的社区中进行。本研究报告了对该试验一个次要结果的分析:家庭使用和购买防蚊产品的支出。我们研究了该试验的教育和动员活动是否促使人们减少在防蚊产品上的支出。
我们在2010年(12312户家庭)和2012年(干预组群5349户家庭,对照组群5142户家庭)对试验社区进行了家庭问卷调查,包括有关社会经济地位、自我报告的登革热疾病以及上个月购买杀虫剂防蚊产品和支出的问题。我们在基线时研究了防蚊产品支出与社会脆弱性的关系,并比较了2012年干预组群和对照组群在这些产品的使用和支出情况。
2010年,12312户家庭中有44.2%报告使用防蚊产品,使用这些产品的家庭平均每月支出为4.61美元。社会脆弱家庭在这些产品上的支出较少。2012年,干预后,干预组群中上个月购买防蚊产品的家庭比例(47.8%;2503/5293)显著低于对照组群(53.3%;2707/5079)(差异-0.05,95%可信区间-0.100至-0.010)。购买这些产品的家庭的平均支出为6.43美元;干预组群中有30.4%,对照组群中有36.7%的家庭支出超过此数(差异-0.06,95%可信区间-0.12至-0.01)。2012年,这些防蚊产品的支出分别占最贫困10%人口家庭月收入的3.3%和3.8%。
“绿道”社区动员干预不仅在减少登革热感染方面有效,而且在减少家庭对杀虫剂防蚊产品的使用和支出方面也有效。
(ISRCTN27581154)