Vector Control Research Centre (ICMR), Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry, India.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(3):e2079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002079. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
Human population migration is a common phenomenon in developing countries. Four categories of migration-endemic to nonendemic areas, rural to urban areas, non-MDA areas to areas that achieved lymphatic filariasis (LF) control/elimination, and across borders-are relevant to LF elimination efforts. In many situations, migrants from endemic areas may not be able to establish active transmission foci and cause infection in local people in known nonendemic areas or countries. Urban areas are at risk of a steady inflow of LF-infected people from rural areas, necessitating prolonged intervention measures or leading to a prolonged "residual microfilaraemia phase." Migration-facilitated reestablishment of transmission in areas that achieved significant control or elimination of LF appears to be difficult, but such risk can not be excluded, particularly in areas with efficient vector-parasite combination. Transborder migration poses significant problems in some countries. Listing of destinations, in endemic and nonendemic regions/countries, and formulation of guidelines for monitoring the settlements and the infection status of migrants can strengthen the LF elimination efforts.
人口迁移是发展中国家的一个常见现象。四类迁移与消灭丝虫病(LF)有关:从流行地区到非流行地区、从农村到城市、从未达标的 MDA 地区到控制/消除地区、跨境迁移。在许多情况下,来自流行地区的移民可能无法在已知的非流行地区或国家建立活跃的传播焦点并导致当地人感染。城市地区面临着来自农村地区不断涌入的 LF 感染者的风险,这需要长期的干预措施或导致长期的“残留微丝蚴期”。在已经实现 LF 显著控制或消除的地区,迁移可能会促进传播的重新建立,这种风险似乎很难排除,但在媒介-寄生虫组合效率高的地区,这种风险不能被排除。跨境迁移在一些国家造成了重大问题。列出流行地区和非流行地区/国家的目的地,并制定监测移民点和移民感染状况的准则,可以加强 LF 消除工作。