Suppr超能文献

[标准妇科手术中膀胱和输尿管损伤的法医学问题]

[Forensic aspects of bladder and ureteral injuries in standard gynecologic operations].

作者信息

Schwenzer T, Beck L

机构信息

Frauenklinik, Heinrich-Heine-Düsseldorf.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1992 Oct;52(10):632-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1023199.

Abstract

Damage to the efferent urinary passages during abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy cannot always be prevented no matter how carefully one may proceed preoperatively and intraoperatively. However, all possibilities of avoiding complications or at least of recognising and eliminating them before surgery, must be explored. Nevertheless, formation of vesicovaginal or ureterovaginal fistulas or of a congested ureter will be rare. In such cases, one cannot jump to the conclusion of mismanagement or a therapeutic error from the mere occurrence of damage. In each individual case, there must be an expertise and a legal judgment as to whether there has been any infringement of the legal requirement to exercise all possible medical care lege artis. Claims for damages are justified only if the conditions of an individual case show, on close examination, that such care had not been exercised.

摘要

无论术前和术中操作多么仔细,腹部或阴道子宫切除术中对泌尿传出通道的损伤并非总能避免。然而,必须探索所有避免并发症的可能性,或者至少在手术前识别并消除并发症的可能性。尽管如此,膀胱阴道瘘、输尿管阴道瘘或输尿管梗阻的形成仍属罕见。在这些情况下,不能仅仅因为出现了损伤就贸然断定存在管理不善或治疗失误。对于每一具体病例,必须就是否违反了依法行使一切可能医疗护理的法律要求进行专业鉴定和法律判定。只有在仔细审查具体病例情况后表明未进行这种护理时,损害赔偿索赔才是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验