Brown C J, Eaton R A, Cragg S M, Goulletquer P, Nicolaidou A, Bebianno M J, Icely J, Daniel G, Nilsson T, Pitman A J, Sawyer G S
University of Portsmouth, School of Biological Sciences, King Henry Building, King Henry I St., Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, United Kingdom.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 Jul;45(1):37-47. doi: 10.1007/s00244-002-0178-7.
To assess the effect of the anti-marine-borer timber preservative CCA (a pressure-impregnated solution of copper, chromium, and arsenic compounds) on nontarget epibiota, fouling community development was investigated. Panels of Scots pine treated to target retentions of 12, 24, and 48 kg CCA per m3 of wood (covering the range of retentions recommended for marine use) plus untreated controls were submerged at seven coastal sites (Portsmouth, UK; La Tremblade [two sites], France; Ria Formosa, Portugal; Sagres, Portugal; Kristineberg, Sweden; Athens, Greece). The fouling community on the surfaces of the panels was assessed both qualitatively and quantitatively after 6, 12, and 18 months of exposure. Multivariate statistical methods were used to compare community structure between panel treatments. Panels treated to the three CCA loadings supported very similar fouling assemblages, which in most cases had higher numbers of taxa and individuals than assemblages on untreated panels. No detrimental effects on epibiota due to CCA preservatives were detected at any of the treatment levels at all seven exposure sites, suggesting that the range of environmental conditions at the sites had no bearing on preservative impact on fouling biota. Differences in community structure between CCA-treated and untreated panels may be due to enhanced larval settlement on CCA-treated timber by some species as a result of modifications to the surface properties of the timber by the preservative. Possible reasons for the higher numbers of certain species on the surface of CCA-treated panels are discussed.
为评估抗海生蛀虫木材防腐剂CCA(一种铜、铬和砷化合物的压力浸渍溶液)对非目标附生生物区系的影响,对污损群落发展进行了调查。将经处理达到每立方米木材12、24和48千克CCA目标保持量(涵盖推荐用于海洋用途的保持量范围)的苏格兰松木板以及未处理的对照板,在七个沿海地点(英国朴茨茅斯;法国拉特雷姆布拉德[两个地点];葡萄牙福尔摩沙湾;葡萄牙萨格里什;瑞典克里斯蒂内贝里;希腊雅典)进行浸泡。在暴露6、12和18个月后,对板表面的污损群落进行了定性和定量评估。使用多元统计方法比较不同处理板之间的群落结构。经三种CCA负载量处理的板所支持的污损组合非常相似,在大多数情况下,其分类单元和个体数量比未处理板上的组合更多。在所有七个暴露地点的任何处理水平下,均未检测到CCA防腐剂对附生生物区系有有害影响,这表明这些地点的环境条件范围与防腐剂对污损生物群的影响无关。经CCA处理和未处理的板之间群落结构的差异,可能是由于防腐剂改变了木材表面性质,导致某些物种在经CCA处理的木材上的幼体附着增加。文中讨论了经CCA处理的板表面某些物种数量较多的可能原因。