• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用Sophy可编程压力阀进行分流植入的临床评估:与Codman-Hakim可编程阀的比较。

Clinical evaluation of shunt implantations using Sophy programmable pressure valves: comparison with Codman-Hakim programmable valves.

作者信息

Katano Hiroyuki, Karasawa Kunio, Sugiyama Naotake, Yamashita Nobuko, Ohkura Atsuhiko, Kamiya Ken

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya City Higashi General Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2003 Sep;10(5):557-61. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(03)00125-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0967-5868(03)00125-5
PMID:12948459
Abstract

We describe our experience with Sophy programmable valve shunts, compared with Codman-Hakim programmable shunts in cases with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). A total of 147 consecutive patients underwent 204 shunt implantations (102 Sophy valves, 51 Codman-Hakim valves, 51 nonprogrammable valves). Of these, 23 Sophy and 25 Codman-Hakim valves respectively were implanted into patients with NPH after SAH. Comparison of reprogramming rate and frequency in cases with NPH after SAH between Sophy and Codman-Hakim valves revealed similar reprogramming rates (65.2 vs. 64.0%) but a higher frequency with the former (1.70 vs. 1.08 times/person). The mean difference between initial and final pressure was 65.3+/-45.8mmH(2)O in cases with Sophy valves, and 25.0+/-14.1mmH(2)O with Codman-Hakim valves. The average period which was required to determine the final pressures with Sophy and Codman-Hakim valves were 56.5+/-45.0 days and 43.3+/-45.7 days, respectively. Total incidence of complications of Sophy and Codman-Hakim valve shunt systems in cases with NPH after SAH were 26.1% (6/23) and 16% (4/25), respectively. Total instances requiring shunt revision with Sophy valves in cases of NPH after SAH were 6 of 23 (26.1%), while for Codman-Hakim valves the figure was 2 of 25 (8.0%). Sophy, as well as Codman-Hakim programmable valve shunts, allow alteration of opening pressure after the implantation according to patients' conditions, which may contribute to reduction of revision. Similar reprogramming rates but lower frequency, and smaller difference between initial and final pressure in Codman-Hakim valves may be ascribed to finer pressure ranges and ease of reprogramming, which facilitates earlier reprogramming and decisions regarding final optimal opening pressure.

摘要

我们描述了在蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后正常压力脑积水(NPH)患者中使用Sophy可编程阀门分流器的经验,并与Codman-Hakim可编程分流器进行了比较。共有147例连续患者接受了204次分流器植入(102个Sophy阀门、51个Codman-Hakim阀门、51个非可编程阀门)。其中,分别有23个Sophy阀门和25个Codman-Hakim阀门植入了SAH后发生NPH的患者体内。比较SAH后NPH患者中Sophy阀门和Codman-Hakim阀门的重新编程率和频率,结果显示重新编程率相似(65.2%对64.0%),但前者的频率更高(1.70次/人对1.08次/人)。使用Sophy阀门的患者,初始压力与最终压力的平均差值为65.3±45.8mmH₂O,而使用Codman-Hakim阀门的患者为25.0±14.1mmH₂O。确定Sophy阀门和Codman-Hakim阀门最终压力所需的平均时间分别为56.5±45.0天和43.3±45.7天。SAH后NPH患者中Sophy和Codman-Hakim阀门分流系统的并发症总发生率分别为26.1%(6/23)和16%(4/25)。SAH后NPH患者中需要用Sophy阀门进行分流器翻修的总数为23例中的6例(26.1%),而Codman-Hakim阀门的这一数字为25例中的2例(8.0%)。Sophy以及Codman-Hakim可编程阀门分流器允许在植入后根据患者情况改变开放压力,这可能有助于减少翻修。Codman-Hakim阀门的重新编程率相似但频率较低,且初始压力与最终压力的差值较小,这可能归因于其更精细的压力范围和易于重新编程,这有利于更早地进行重新编程并决定最终的最佳开放压力。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of shunt implantations using Sophy programmable pressure valves: comparison with Codman-Hakim programmable valves.使用Sophy可编程压力阀进行分流植入的临床评估:与Codman-Hakim可编程阀的比较。
J Clin Neurosci. 2003 Sep;10(5):557-61. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(03)00125-5.
2
Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients.可程控Codman Hakim瓣膜的七年临床经验:对583例患者的回顾性研究
J Neurosurg. 2000 Jun;92(6):941-8. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0941.
3
The programmable shunt-system Codman Medos Hakim: A clinical observation study and review of literature.可程控分流系统Codman Medos Hakim:一项临床观察研究及文献综述
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Oct;173:154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
4
A randomized, controlled study of a programmable shunt valve versus a conventional valve for patients with hydrocephalus. Hakim-Medos Investigator Group.一项针对脑积水患者的可编程分流阀与传统阀门的随机对照研究。哈基姆-梅多斯研究小组。
Neurosurgery. 1999 Dec;45(6):1399-408; discussion 1408-11. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199912000-00026.
5
Comparison of programmable shunt valves vs standard valves for communicating hydrocephalus of adults: a retrospective analysis of 407 patients.成人交通性脑积水的可编程分流阀与标准分流阀的比较:407例患者的回顾性分析
Surg Neurol. 2005 Jan;63(1):36-41; discussion 41. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.03.015.
6
The programmable adult Codman Hakim valve is useful even in very small children with hydrocephalus. A 7-year retrospective study with special focus on cost/benefit analysis.可编程的成人Codman Hakim瓣膜即使在患有脑积水的非常小的儿童中也很有用。一项为期7年的回顾性研究,特别关注成本效益分析。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Feb;16(1):1-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-923904.
7
Effect of 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging on various pressure programmable shunt valves.3特斯拉磁共振成像对各种压力可编程分流阀的影响。
J Neurosurg. 2005 Aug;103(2 Suppl):163-5. doi: 10.3171/ped.2005.103.2.0163.
8
The Hakim programmable valve: reasons for reprogramming failures.哈基姆可编程阀门:重新编程失败的原因
J Neurosurg. 2007 Oct;107(4):788-91. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/10/0788.
9
Laboratory testing of hydrocephalus shunts -- conclusion of the U.K. Shunt evaluation programme.脑积水分流器的实验室检测——英国分流器评估项目的结论
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 Jun;144(6):525-38; discussion 538. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-0922-9.
10
Magnetic field interactions in adjustable hydrocephalus shunts.可调式脑积水分流器中的磁场相互作用。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2008 Sep;2(3):222-8. doi: 10.3171/PED/2008/2/9/222.

引用本文的文献

1
The Evolution of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Valves and Why They Fail.脑室腹腔分流阀的演变及其失效原因
World Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;194:123593. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123593. Epub 2025 Jan 18.