Czosnyka Z, Czosnyka M, Richards H K, Pickard J D
Academic Neurosurgical Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 Jun;144(6):525-38; discussion 538. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-0922-9.
16 models of valves, currently in use in the U.K., have been tested long-term in the U.K. Shunt Evaluation Laboratory according to the protocol based on the new ISO 7197 standard. Valves tested were: Medtronic PS Medical: Delta Valve, Flow Control and Lumbo-Peritoneal Shunt, Heyer-Schulte Nero-Care: In-line, Low Profile and Pudenz Flushing Valve, Codman: Codman-Hakim Programmable, Hakim Precision, Accu-Flo, Holter, Uni-Shunt, and siphon-preventing device -- SiphonGuard, NMT: Orbis-Sigma Valve, Omni-Shunt and Hakim Valve, Sophysa: Sophy Programmable Valve, Radionics: Contour-Flex Valve. The majority of the valves had a non-physiologically low hydrodynamic resistance (with the exception of Orbis-Sigma, PS Lumbo-Peritoneal and Heyer-Schulte In-Line). This may result in overdrainage both related to posture and during nocturnal cerebral vasogenic waves. A long distal catheter increases the resistance of these valves by 100-200%. Drainage through valves without siphon-preventing mechanism is very sensitive to body posture. This may produce grossly negative intracranial pressure after implantation. A few shunts (Delta, Low Profile and Pudenz-Flushing with Anti-Siphon Devices) offer a reasonable resistance to negative outlet pressure, and hence potentially might prevent complications related to overdrainage. On the other hand, valves with siphon-preventing devices may be blocked by raised subcutaneous pressure (exception: SiphonGuard, but this device may block the drainage because of its faulty design). In most of the silicone-diaphragm valves, closing pressure varied and reached values lower than that specified by the manufacturer (exception: Heyer-Schulte Pudenz Flushing Valve). All programmable valves are susceptible to overdrainage in the upright body position. Programmed settings may be changed by external magnetic fields. Most shunts are very sensitive to the presence of small particles in the drained fluid. The behavior of a valve revealed during such testing is of immediate relevance to the surgeon and may not be adequately described in the manufacturer's product information. These results are also relevant to the assessment of shunt function in-vivo using an infusion test.
目前在英国使用的16种型号的分流阀已在英国分流评估实验室按照基于新ISO 7197标准的方案进行了长期测试。所测试的分流阀有:美敦力PS医疗公司的Delta阀、流量控制和腰-腹分流管;海耶-舒尔特Nero-Care公司的在线式、低剖面和普登兹冲洗阀;科德曼公司的科德曼-哈基姆可编程分流阀、哈基姆精密分流阀、Accu-Flo分流阀、霍尔特分流阀、单分流阀以及防虹吸装置——SiphonGuard;NMT公司的奥比斯-西格玛阀、全向分流阀和哈基姆阀;索菲萨公司的索菲可编程分流阀;雷迪onics公司的Contour-Flex分流阀。大多数分流阀具有非生理性的低流体动力阻力(奥比斯-西格玛阀、PS腰-腹分流管和海耶-舒尔特在线式分流阀除外)。这可能导致与体位相关的以及夜间脑血管源性波动期间的过度引流。较长的远端导管会使这些分流阀的阻力增加100%至200%。通过没有防虹吸机制的分流阀进行的引流对身体姿势非常敏感。这可能在植入后产生严重的颅内负压。一些分流器(带防虹吸装置的Delta阀、低剖面阀和普登兹冲洗阀)对负出口压力具有合理的阻力,因此有可能预防与过度引流相关的并发症。另一方面,带有防虹吸装置的分流阀可能会因皮下压力升高而堵塞(例外情况:SiphonGuard,但该装置可能因其设计缺陷而堵塞引流)。在大多数硅树脂隔膜分流阀中,关闭压力各不相同,且达到的值低于制造商规定的值(例外情况:海耶-舒尔特普登兹冲洗阀)。所有可编程分流阀在直立体位时都容易出现过度引流。编程设置可能会因外部磁场而改变。大多数分流器对引流液中存在的小颗粒非常敏感。在这种测试中显示出的分流阀行为与外科医生直接相关,并且可能在制造商的产品信息中没有得到充分描述。这些结果也与使用输注测试评估体内分流功能相关。