De Weerd P, Reinke K, Ryan L, McIsaac T, Perschler P, Schnyer D, Trouard T, Gmitro A
Laboratory of Perception and Action, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology (Bldg. 68), University of Arizona, 1503 E. University Boulevard, PO Box 210068, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1405-16. doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00222-2.
We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the cortical mechanisms contributing to the acquisition and performance of a complex, bimanual motor sequence. To that aim, five subjects were trained on a difficult, asymmetrical finger opposition task. Their performance rate almost doubled in the course of training and approached the performance rate in an untrained, symmetrical finger opposition task. Before training, performance of the asymmetrical sequence was associated with activity in M1, premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, and parietal cortex. After training, performance of the asymmetrical sequence was associated mainly with activity in M1, and little activity outside M1 remained. The latter pattern of cortical activation resembled that observed during the execution of symmetrical sequences, which was unaffected by practice with the asymmetrical sequence. The activation pattern obtained with the symmetrical bimanual sequence was indistinguishable from the combined activation measured in contralateral hemispheres during unimanual control sequences. The data indicate that cortical regions previously implicated in the acquisition of difficult unimanual motor sequences also contribute to the acquisition of asymmetrical bimanual sequences. We found no evidence for an expansion of activity in M1 after acquisition of the asymmetrical sequence (while this has been reported after acquisition of unimanual sequences). In the context of existing literature, the data suggest that the acquisition of unimanual and bimanual motor sequences may rely on similar cortical mechanisms, but that the formation of long-term, procedural memories for the two types of sequences might at least in part depend on different mechanisms.
我们使用功能磁共振成像来研究有助于复杂双手运动序列习得和执行的皮质机制。为此,对五名受试者进行了一项困难的、不对称手指对指任务的训练。在训练过程中,他们的完成率几乎翻倍,并接近了未训练的对称手指对指任务的完成率。训练前,不对称序列的表现与初级运动皮层(M1)、运动前皮层、辅助运动皮层和顶叶皮层的活动相关。训练后,不对称序列的表现主要与M1的活动相关,M1以外几乎没有活动。后一种皮质激活模式类似于在对称序列执行过程中观察到的模式,该模式不受不对称序列练习的影响。对称双手序列获得的激活模式与单手控制序列期间在对侧半球测量的联合激活无法区分。数据表明,先前与困难单手运动序列习得相关的皮质区域也有助于不对称双手序列的习得。我们没有发现获得不对称序列后M1活动扩展的证据(而在获得单手序列后曾有过相关报道)。结合现有文献来看,数据表明单手和双手运动序列的习得可能依赖于相似的皮质机制,但这两种序列的长期程序性记忆的形成可能至少部分取决于不同的机制。