Inoue Toshihiko
Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul;33(7):327-30. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyg069.
The differences in radiotherapeutic treatment systems for cervical cancer between the United States and Japan can be attributed either to the tolerance of high-risk organs, or dosimetry itself. High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is the standard treatment for uterine cervix carcinoma in Japan. In addition, HDR Co-60 afterloading machines have been gradually replaced with Ir-192 micro-source afterloading machines during the past ten years. This implies that it has now become impossible to conduct a prospective comparative study of HDR versus low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy for cervical cancer in Japan. An examination of the history of HDR intracavitary radiotherapy for uterine cervix carcinoma in Japan led us to the conclusion that HDR intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer is as effective as LDR intracavitary brachytherapy in terms of both survival and complications. In Japan, studies on the former can be drawn from a long experience of more than 35 years.
美国和日本在宫颈癌放射治疗系统上的差异,要么可归因于高危器官的耐受性,要么可归因于剂量测定本身。高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗是日本子宫颈癌的标准治疗方法。此外,在过去十年中,HDR钴-60后装治疗机已逐渐被铱-192微型源后装治疗机所取代。这意味着在日本,现在已无法对宫颈癌的HDR与低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗进行前瞻性比较研究。对日本子宫颈癌HDR腔内放射治疗历史的考察使我们得出结论,就生存率和并发症而言,HDR腔内近距离放射治疗宫颈癌与LDR腔内近距离放射治疗同样有效。在日本,对前者的研究可以借鉴超过35年的长期经验。