Gupta Subhash, Giridhar Prashanth, Sharma Dayanand, K P Haresh, P K Julka, Rath Goura K
Department of Radiation Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Email:
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):2653-2657. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2653.
Introduction: Cancer of the cervix is the second most common cancer in women in India. Chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced carcinoma cervix. Chemotherapy is not given on days of brachytherapy due to the fear of increased toxicity though studies supporting or refuting it are limited. We intended to study feasibility of adding chemotherapy to brachytherapy with assessment of acute toxicity and response rates. Methods: 29 patients of locally advanced carcinoma cervix (FIGO IIB to IIIB) were assigned to receive either three sessions of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy alone or HDR brachytherapy with concurrent chemotherapy of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin after completion of external beam radiation with concurrent Cisplatin. Patients were assessed for compliance of treatment, toxicity and response rates at three and six months. The p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fischer’s exact test was used for statistical analysis. Results: 15 patients were assigned to the standard of care arm and 14 patients to the experimental chemo-brachytherapy arm. The median number of cycles of chemotherapy possible with brachytherapy was two (Range: 1 -3). At three months after treatment all patients except one patient in each arm had a complete response. There was two acute grade 3 hematological toxicity and two acute grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicity in the experimental arm but none in the standard arm. The experimental arm had a statistically higher incidence of acute grade 3 and 4 toxicity than the standard arm (p=0.042). Conclusions: Chemo-brachytherapy is associated with higher acute toxicity with comparable response rates. Small patient numbers and short follow up impedes us from providing conclusive evidence.
宫颈癌是印度女性中第二常见的癌症。放化疗是局部晚期宫颈癌的标准治疗方法。由于担心毒性增加,在近距离放疗期间不进行化疗,不过支持或反驳这一观点的研究有限。我们旨在研究在近距离放疗中加入化疗的可行性,并评估急性毒性和缓解率。方法:29例局部晚期宫颈癌(国际妇产科联盟IIB至IIIB期)患者被分配接受单独的三个疗程高剂量率(HDR)近距离放疗,或在完成同步顺铂外照射后接受HDR近距离放疗并同步使用紫杉醇和卡铂化疗。在三个月和六个月时评估患者的治疗依从性、毒性和缓解率。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。采用Fisher精确检验进行统计分析。结果:15例患者被分配到标准治疗组,14例患者被分配到实验性化疗近距离放疗组。近距离放疗期间可能进行的化疗周期中位数为两个(范围:1 - 3)。治疗后三个月,除每组各有一名患者外,所有患者均有完全缓解。实验组有两例急性3级血液学毒性和两例急性3级或更高等级的胃肠道毒性,而标准组无此类情况。实验组急性3级和4级毒性的发生率在统计学上高于标准组(p = 0.042)。结论:化疗近距离放疗与较高的急性毒性相关,但缓解率相当。患者数量少和随访时间短阻碍了我们提供确凿证据。