Grilo Carlos M, Sanislow Charles A, Shea M Tracie, Skodol Andrew E, Stout Robert L, Pagano Maria E, Yen Shirley, McGlashan Thomas H
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06519, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2003 Nov;34(3):319-30. doi: 10.1002/eat.10196.
To examine prospectively the natural course of bulimia nervosa (BN) and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and to test the effects of personality disorder (PD) comorbidity on the outcomes.
Ninety-two female patients with current BN (N=23) or EDNOS (N=69) were evaluated at baseline enrollment in the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study (CLPS). Eating disorders (EDs) were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Personality disorders (PDs) were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV PD (DIPD-IV). The course of BN and EDNOS was assessed with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation and the course of PDs was evaluated with the Follow-Along version of the DIPD-IV at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Probability of remission at 24 months was 40% for BN and 59% for EDNOS. To test the effects of PD comorbidity on course, ED patients were divided into groups with no, one, and two or more PDs. Cox proportional regression analyses revealed that BN had a longer time to remission than EDNOS (p<.05). The number of PDs was not a significant predictor of time to remission, nor was the presence of Axis I psychiatric comorbidity or Global Assessment of Functioning scores. Analyses using proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariates revealed that PD instability was unrelated to changes in ED.
BN has a worse 24-month course (longer time to remission) than EDNOS. The natural course of BN and EDNOS is not influenced significantly by the presence, severity, or time-varying changes of co-occurring PDs, co-occurring Axis I disorders, or by global functioning.
前瞻性地研究神经性贪食症(BN)和未特定的进食障碍(EDNOS)的自然病程,并检验人格障碍(PD)共病对其结局的影响。
在协作性纵向人格障碍研究(CLPS)的基线入组时,对92名当前患有BN(N = 23)或EDNOS(N = 69)的女性患者进行评估。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I障碍的结构化临床访谈来评估进食障碍(ED)。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍诊断访谈(DIPD-IV)来评估人格障碍(PD)。在6、12和24个月时,使用纵向间隔随访评估来评估BN和EDNOS的病程,并使用DIPD-IV的随诊版本来评估PD的病程。
BN在24个月时的缓解概率为40%,EDNOS为59%。为检验PD共病对病程的影响,将ED患者分为无PD、有1种PD以及有2种或更多种PD的组。Cox比例回归分析显示,BN达到缓解的时间比EDNOS长(p <.05)。PD的数量不是缓解时间的显著预测因素,轴I精神疾病共病的存在或功能总体评估得分也不是。使用含时变协变量的比例风险回归分析显示,PD的不稳定性与ED的变化无关。
BN的24个月病程(达到缓解的时间更长)比EDNOS更差。BN和EDNOS的自然病程不受共病的PD、共病的轴I障碍的存在、严重程度或时变变化,或总体功能的显著影响。