Grilo Carlos M, Pagano Maria E, Skodol Andrew E, Sanislow Charles A, McGlashan Thomas H, Gunderson John G, Stout Robert L
Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn 06519, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 May;68(5):738-46. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0511.
To examine prospectively the natural course of bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) and to test for the effects of personality disorder psychopathology on remission and relapse.
Subjects were 92 female patients with current bulimia nervosa (N = 23) or EDNOS (N = 69) at baseline enrollment in the Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study. Axis I psychiatric disorders (including eating disorders) were assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Version, and personality disorders were assessed with the Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). The course of eating disorders was assessed with the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation and the course of personality disorders with the Follow-Along version of the DIPD-IV at 6 and 12 months and then yearly through 60 months. The study was conducted from July 1996 through June 2005.
Probability of remission by 60 months was 74% for bulimia nervosa and 83% for EDNOS, and probability of relapse among those with a remission was 47% for bulimia nervosa and 42% for EDNOS. Patients with and without personality disorders did not differ in probability of remission. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses revealed that bulimia nervosa and EDNOS did not differ significantly in time to remission and that personality disorder comorbidity did not significantly predict time to remission. Analyses using proportional hazards regression with time-varying covariates revealed that dimensional changes in personality disorders were minimally related to either remission or relapse in these eating disorders.
The 5-year natural course of bulimia nervosa and EDNOS differed little with both eating disorder categories showing similar patterns of remissions and relapses. These findings suggest the clinical significance of EDNOS and the need for further research on this most common but least studied eating disorder. The natural course of bulimia nervosa and EDNOS does not appear to be influenced significantly by the presence, severity, or time-varying changes of co-occurring personality disorder psychopathology.
前瞻性地研究神经性贪食症和未另行规定的进食障碍(EDNOS)的自然病程,并检验人格障碍精神病理学对缓解和复发的影响。
研究对象为92名女性患者,她们在协作性纵向人格障碍研究的基线入组时患有当前神经性贪食症(N = 23)或EDNOS(N = 69)。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I障碍患者版结构化临床访谈评估轴I精神障碍(包括进食障碍),并使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版人格障碍诊断访谈(DIPD-IV)评估人格障碍。在6个月和12个月时,使用纵向间隔随访评估来评估进食障碍的病程,并使用DIPD-IV的随诊版本评估人格障碍的病程,然后每年评估一次,直至60个月。该研究于1996年7月至2005年6月进行。
神经性贪食症在60个月时的缓解概率为74%,EDNOS为83%;缓解者中神经性贪食症的复发概率为47%,EDNOS为42%。有无人格障碍的患者在缓解概率上没有差异。Cox比例风险回归分析显示,神经性贪食症和EDNOS在缓解时间上没有显著差异,人格障碍共病也没有显著预测缓解时间。使用带有随时间变化协变量的比例风险回归分析显示,人格障碍的维度变化与这些进食障碍的缓解或复发几乎没有关系。
神经性贪食症和EDNOS的5年自然病程差异不大,两种进食障碍类别都显示出相似的缓解和复发模式。这些发现表明了EDNOS的临床意义以及对这种最常见但研究最少的进食障碍进行进一步研究的必要性。神经性贪食症和EDNOS的自然病程似乎没有受到共病的人格障碍精神病理学的存在、严重程度或随时间变化的显著影响。