Ciancaglini R, Colombo-Bolla G, Gherlone E F, Radaelli G
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, LITA, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Sep;30(9):878-86. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01070.x.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between orientation of craniofacial planes relative to the true horizontal and temporomandibular disorder (TMD), in normal occlusion. Fourteen university dental students, with full natural dentition and bilateral Angle Class I occlusion, who exhibited signs and symptoms of TMD, were compared with 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Frontal and lateral photographs were taken in natural head position with the subject standing up, clenching a Fox plane and having a facial arch positioned. Photographs were examined by a standardized image analysis. Inter-pupillary axis, Frankfurt, occlusal and Camper planes were evaluated. In frontal view, the Frankfurt plane was right rotated relative to the true horizontal both in TMD subjects (P < 0.01) and controls (P < 0.05), but rotation was larger in TMD subjects (mean difference between groups, 1.1 degrees, 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 0.2-2.0 degrees ). No significant deviation from the horizontal or difference between groups was observed for the interpupillary axis and occlusal plane. In lateral view, the Frankfurt plane was upward-orientated relative to the true horizontal in TMD group (mean angular deviation 2.8 degrees, 95% CI, 1.0-4.6 degrees ). The occlusal and Camper planes were downward-orientated in both groups (P < 0.0001), but inclination of occlusal plane tended to be smaller in TMD subjects (mean difference between groups, -3.8 degrees, 95% CI, -7.6-0.1 degrees ). Angles between any craniofacial planes did not significantly differ between groups. The findings show that in young adults with normal occlusion, a weak association exists between the orientation of craniofacial planes in natural head position and signs and symptoms of TMD. Furthermore, they suggest that, within this population, TMD might be mainly associated with head posture rather than with craniofacial morphology.
本研究旨在调查正常咬合情况下颅面平面相对于真水平线的方向与颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)之间的关系。选取了14名患有TMD体征和症状的大学牙科学生,他们均为全天然牙列且双侧安氏I类咬合,将其与14名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者进行比较。让受试者站立,咬紧Fox平面并放置面部弓,在自然头位拍摄正面和侧面照片。通过标准化图像分析检查照片。评估了瞳孔间轴、法兰克福平面、咬合平面和坎珀平面。在正面视图中,TMD受试者(P < 0.01)和对照组(P < 0.05)的法兰克福平面相对于真水平线均向右旋转,但TMD受试者的旋转幅度更大(组间平均差异为1.1度,95%置信区间,95%CI,0.2 - 2.0度)。瞳孔间轴和咬合平面未观察到与水平线的显著偏差或组间差异。在侧面视图中,TMD组的法兰克福平面相对于真水平线向上倾斜(平均角度偏差2.8度,95%CI,1.0 - 4.6度)。两组的咬合平面和坎珀平面均向下倾斜(P < 0.0001),但TMD受试者的咬合平面倾斜度往往较小(组间平均差异为 - 3.8度,95%CI, - 7.6 - 0.1度)。各组之间任何颅面平面之间的角度无显著差异。研究结果表明,在咬合正常的年轻成年人中,自然头位时颅面平面的方向与TMD的体征和症状之间存在微弱关联。此外,研究结果表明,在该人群中,TMD可能主要与头部姿势而非颅面形态有关。