• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家执业医师数据库提供的信息有多大用处?

How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?

作者信息

Waters Teresa M, Parsons Jennifer, Warnecke Richard, Almagor Orit, Budetti Peter P

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Health Services Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Aug;29(8):416-24. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29050-x.

DOI:10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29050-x
PMID:12953606
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) serves as a federal information clearinghouse on malpractice payments for and disciplinary sanctions against health care practitioners. Hospitals are required to query the NPDB biannually for practitioners with clinical privileges, and other health care entities with significant peer review are encouraged to query the NPDB. A study was conducted to determine whether health care organizations find the NPDB useful.

METHODS

A survey was conducted of 1,038 organizations that queried the NPDB between March 1998 and February 1999; 653 of those respondents also answered questions regarding 1,639 specific matched responses (feedback from the NPDB when the practitioner in question had one or more reports).

RESULTS

Overall, the entities rated querying the NPDB as very useful (6.16 on a 7-point scale). More than 21% of matched responses contained new information, and this information altered institutional credentialing decisions in more than 5% of the cases.

DISCUSSION

Many of the results from this study are consistent with findings in Office of Inspector General reports. The fact that 5% of credentialing decisions were altered because of NPDB information suggests that practitioner self-report is an inadequate mechanism for soliciting credentialing information.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

NPDB reports provide accurate and complete information that is useful to providers in their credentialing process.

摘要

背景

国家从业者数据库(NPDB)是一个联邦信息交换中心,用于存储医疗从业者的医疗事故赔偿和纪律处分信息。医院必须每两年查询一次NPDB,以了解具有临床特权的从业者情况,同时鼓励其他进行重要同行评审的医疗保健机构查询NPDB。开展了一项研究,以确定医疗保健组织是否认为NPDB有用。

方法

对1998年3月至1999年2月期间查询NPDB的1038个组织进行了调查;其中653名受访者还回答了有关1639个特定匹配回复(当相关从业者有一份或多份报告时,NPDB给出的反馈)的问题。

结果

总体而言,这些机构将查询NPDB评为非常有用(在7分制中为6.16分)。超过21%的匹配回复包含新信息,并且这些信息在超过5%的案例中改变了机构的资格认证决定。

讨论

这项研究的许多结果与监察长办公室报告中的发现一致。由于NPDB信息而改变了5%的资格认证决定,这一事实表明从业者自我报告作为获取资格认证信息的机制并不充分。

总结与结论

NPDB报告提供了准确和完整的信息,对提供者在资格认证过程中很有用。

相似文献

1
How useful is the information provided by the National Practitioner Data Bank?国家执业医师数据库提供的信息有多大用处?
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Aug;29(8):416-24. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29050-x.
2
The National Practitioner Data Bank: implications for nurse anesthetists.国家从业者数据银行:对麻醉护士的影响。
CRNA. 1998 Nov;9(4):157-62.
3
Hospital peer review and the National Practitioner Data Bank: clinical privileges action reports.医院同行评审与国家从业者数据库:临床特权行动报告
JAMA. 1999 Jul 28;282(4):349-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.4.349.
4
HHS database is risky source for credentialing.卫生与公众服务部(HHS)数据库是用于资格认证的风险来源。
Hosp Peer Rev. 2001 Feb;26(2):21-2, 17-8.
5
The role of the national practitioner data bank in the credentialing process.
Am J Med Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):30-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860605283644.
6
Physician understanding of the National Practitioner Data Bank.
South Med J. 1995 Feb;88(2):200-3. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199502000-00007.
7
The National Practitioner Data Bank: what CRNAs need to know.国家从业者数据库:CRNAs需要了解的内容。
AANA J. 2013 Apr;81(2):97-102.
8
Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?《医疗质量改进法案》与全国从业人员数据银行:我们如今处于何种状况?
QRC Advis. 1999 Nov;16(1):1-6.
9
Reports to the National Practitioner Data Bank involving dentists, 1990-2004.1990年至2004年向国家从业者数据库提交的涉及牙医的报告。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Apr;137(4):523-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0225.
10
The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.国家从业者数据库:最初的18个月
Physician Exec. 1993 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Licensure Actions Against Psychiatric Clinicians: A Cohort Analysis of National Practitioner Database Reports.针对精神科临床医生的执业许可行动:对国家从业者数据库报告的队列分析
J Psychiatr Pract. 2025 Jan 1;31(1):35-41. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000831.
2
The development of a taxonomy of wrongdoing in medical practice and research.医疗实践和研究中不当行为的分类法的发展。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jan;42(1):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.08.027.