Suppr超能文献

The role of the national practitioner data bank in the credentialing process.

作者信息

Waters Teresa M, Warnecke Richard B, Parsons Jennifer, Almagor Orit, Budetti Peter P

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Office of Community Affairs, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2006 Jan-Feb;21(1):30-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860605283644.

Abstract

Federal law requires hospitals and permits other entities to seek information from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) but places no requirements on how that information should be used. Our survey of NPDB users demonstrates that although the NPDB has generated substantial controversy and its information is nominally available from other sources, it still plays an important role in the credentialing process. Most institutions make timely NPDB inquiries that facilitate widespread use of the information in credentialing activities (4-5 individuals or committees). However, in 3% to 7% of cases, a decision was reached before the institution had the NPDB report. Between 5% and 30% of privileging and licensure applications involving an NPDB report were not granted "as requested," suggesting the NPDB data are important to the process. Unfortunately, underreporting was also evident: 60% to 75% of reportable actions were not reported, limiting the information to which health care entities have access.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验