Makary Martin A, Kiernan Paul D, Sheridan Michael J, Tonnesen Glen, Hetrick Vivian, Vaughan Betty, Graling Paula, Elster Eric
Department of Surgery, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Am Surg. 2003 Aug;69(8):693-700; discussion 700-2.
Treatment of esophageal cancer has traditionally included surgery as the initial modality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy has been introduced with the goal of downstaging tumors before surgical resection; however, its role in esophageal cancer remains controversial. We report 116 patients who underwent esophagogastrectomy with reconstruction for carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction over a 10-year period (January 1, 1990 to June 1, 2001). Forty patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery. Hospital mortality in this group was 7.5 per cent, complete pathologic response (CPR) was 37.5 per cent, and overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 47 and 38 per cent. Five-year survival in the 15 patients with CPR was 85 per cent. Five patients underwent neoadjuvant single-agent therapy (four chemotherapy and one radiation) followed by surgery, and none survived to 3 years. Seventy-one patients underwent surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. Hospital mortality in this group was 1.4 per cent, with 3- and 5-year survival of 21 and 17 per cent--a decreased long-term survival compared with the neoadjuvant therapy group despite the observation that patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a larger tumor size on presentation (5.5 +/- 0.4 cm vs 3.8 +/- 0.2 cm; P = 0.002). Squamous cell carcinomas seemed to be more responsive to neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy followed by surgery than were adenocarcinomas, with a CPR of 44.4 versus 35.5 per cent; however, 5-year survival rates in these complete responders were not significantly different (100% and 78%, respectively; P = 0.97). We report that esophagogastrectomy in conjunction with neoadjuvant therapy results in increased survival compared with surgery without neoadjuvant therapy (P < 0.01), although there may be an increased perioperative mortality associated with neoadjuvant therapy. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of preoperative chemoradiation and to better identify the pretreatment characteristics of patients with a complete pathological response.
传统上,食管癌的治疗以手术作为初始治疗方式。新辅助放化疗已被引入,目的是在手术切除前使肿瘤降期;然而,其在食管癌治疗中的作用仍存在争议。我们报告了116例在10年期间(1990年1月1日至2001年6月1日)因食管癌或食管胃交界部癌接受食管胃切除术并重建的患者。40例患者接受了新辅助放疗和化疗,随后进行手术。该组患者的医院死亡率为7.5%,完全病理缓解(CPR)率为37.5%,3年和5年总生存率分别为47%和38%。15例达到CPR的患者的5年生存率为85%。5例患者接受了新辅助单药治疗(4例化疗和1例放疗),随后进行手术,无一例存活至3年。71例患者未接受新辅助治疗直接进行手术。该组患者的医院死亡率为1.4%,3年和5年生存率分别为21%和17%——尽管观察到接受新辅助治疗的患者就诊时肿瘤体积更大(5.5±0.4 cm对3.8±0.2 cm;P = 0.002),但与新辅助治疗组相比,其长期生存率有所降低。鳞状细胞癌似乎比腺癌对新辅助放疗和化疗后手术的反应更敏感,CPR率分别为44.4%和35.5%;然而,这些完全缓解者的5年生存率无显著差异(分别为100%和78%;P = 0.97)。我们报告,与未接受新辅助治疗的手术相比,食管胃切除术联合新辅助治疗可提高生存率(P < 0.01),尽管新辅助治疗可能会增加围手术期死亡率。需要进一步研究来评估术前放化疗的作用,并更好地确定具有完全病理缓解的患者的预处理特征。