Rohatgi Pooja R, Swisher Stephen G, Correa Arlene M, Wu Tsung-T, Liao Zhongxing, Walsh Garrett L, Vaporciyan Ara A, Rice David C, Fukami Norio, Roth Jack A, Ajani Jaffer A
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, USA.
Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2005;36(2):69-76. doi: 10.1385/IJGC:36:2:69.
To analyze the differences in clinical stage, pathologic response to chemoradiotherapy, patterns of failure, and overall survival (OS) between patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ACA) of the esophagus.
We stratified patients by two histologies, ACA and SCC, and statistically compared their clinical stage, post-therapy pathologic response, patterns of failure, and OS.
Of the 235 patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, 42 (18%) had SCC and 193 (82%) had ACA. Among the ACA patients, a significantly larger proportion was male (93% vs 7%; p <0.001), whereas sex was distributed similarly among SCC patients (55% male vs 45% female; p = 0.5). A significantly larger percentage of SCC patients were classified as lower TN and overall stage than ACA patients (T2 = 41% vs 28%, p <0.0001; N0 = 69% vs 48%, p = 0.01; stage II = 76% vs 55%, p <0.001). A significantly greater portion of SCCs was categorized as pathologic N0 after treatment (71% vs 65%; p = 0.02). Among the pathCR patients in clinical stage II, there were significantly greater proportion of SCC patients (77% vs 63%; p <0.001) than ACA patients. Among the pathCR patients in clinical stage III patients, a significantly greater proportion were ACA patients (38% vs 23%; p <0.001) than SCC patients. The median and 5-yr OS was 53 +/- 11 mo and 39% for ACA patients and 35 +/- 14 mo and 37% for SCC (median OS, p = 0.3). Among pathCR patients, median OS of ACA patients (133 mo) was longer than that of SCC patients but nonsignificant (29 mo; p = 0.07); results were similar for non-pathCR patients. DFS results were similar in all subgroups. Among the whole cohort, incidence of local-regional recurrence and distant metastases did not vary significantly. The median time to distant metastases did not vary significantly for pathCR and non-pathCR patients.
We believe this is the first study that compares failure outcome of ACA and SCC patients with similar clinical stage after trimodality therapy. Our data suggest that significant differences in clinical stage and post-therapy pathologic stage exist between ACA and SCC. Frequent presence of malignant nodes in the resected specimens of ACA patients resulted in a shorter time-to-metastases suggesting that ACA patients need better systemic control.
分析食管鳞状细胞癌(SCC)和腺癌(ACA)患者在临床分期、对放化疗的病理反应、失败模式及总生存期(OS)方面的差异。
我们根据两种组织学类型(ACA和SCC)对患者进行分层,并对其临床分期、治疗后病理反应、失败模式及OS进行统计学比较。
在接受术前放化疗的235例患者中,42例(18%)为SCC,193例(82%)为ACA。在ACA患者中,男性比例显著更高(93%对7%;p<0.001),而SCC患者的性别分布相似(男性55%对女性45%;p = 0.5)。与ACA患者相比,SCC患者中TN分期较低及总体分期较低的比例显著更高(T2 = 41%对28%,p<0.0001;N0 = 69%对48%,p = 0.01;II期 = 76%对55%,p<0.001)。治疗后,SCC被归类为病理N0的比例显著更高(71%对65%;p = 0.02)。在临床II期达到病理完全缓解(pathCR)的患者中,SCC患者的比例显著高于ACA患者(77%对63%;p<0.001)。在临床III期达到pathCR的患者中,ACA患者的比例显著高于SCC患者(38%对23%;p<0.001)。ACA患者的中位OS和5年OS分别为53±11个月和39%,SCC患者为35±14个月和37%(中位OS,p = 0.3)。在pathCR患者中,ACA患者的中位OS(133个月)长于SCC患者,但无统计学意义(29个月;p = 0.07);非pathCR患者的结果相似。所有亚组的无病生存期(DFS)结果相似。在整个队列中,局部区域复发和远处转移的发生率无显著差异。pathCR和非pathCR患者发生远处转移的中位时间无显著差异。
我们认为这是第一项比较接受三联疗法后临床分期相似的ACA和SCC患者失败结局的研究。我们的数据表明,ACA和SCC在临床分期和治疗后病理分期方面存在显著差异。ACA患者切除标本中恶性淋巴结的频繁存在导致转移时间缩短,提示ACA患者需要更好的全身控制。