Suppr超能文献

健康状况测量工具重测信度的两个时间间隔比较。

A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments.

作者信息

Marx Robert G, Menezes Alia, Horovitz Lois, Jones Edward C, Warren Russell F

机构信息

Sports Medicine and Shoulder Service Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;56(8):730-5. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00084-2.

Abstract

Studies of test-retest reliability for health-related quality of life instruments have used varying intervals between test administrations. There is no evidence available to aid in the selection of the time interval between questionnaire administrations for a study of test-retest reliability for health status instruments. We compared the test-retest reliability at 2 days and 2 weeks for four knee-rating scales and the eight domains of the SF-36. Seventy patients with disorders of the knee who were in a stable state were randomly allocated to repeat the questionnaires at either 2 days or 2 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences in the test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and limits of agreement statistics) for the two time intervals.

摘要

关于健康相关生活质量工具的重测信度研究采用了不同的测试间隔时间。目前尚无证据可帮助选择用于健康状况工具重测信度研究的问卷发放时间间隔。我们比较了四种膝关节评分量表和SF-36的八个领域在2天和2周时的重测信度。70名处于稳定状态的膝关节疾病患者被随机分配在2天或2周后重复填写问卷。两个时间间隔的重测信度(组内相关系数和一致性界限统计量)没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验