Suppr超能文献

基于指征使用不同刚度的经椎弓根器械进行腰椎融合术的评估:一项为期3年随访的前瞻性初步研究。

Evaluation of indication-based use of transpedicular instrumentations with different rigidity for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective pilot study with 3 years of follow-up.

作者信息

Pfeiffer Michael, Hildebrand Ralph, Grande Michael, Griss Peter

机构信息

HELIOS Rosmann Klinik, Zeppelinstrasse 37, 79206, Breisach, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2003 Aug;12(4):369-77. doi: 10.1007/s00586-002-0510-y. Epub 2003 Feb 11.

Abstract

In a prospective cohort study in 94 patients with 3 years' follow-up the efficacy of rigid and semi-rigid transpedicular instrumentation for lumbar spine fusion was evaluated via three established scores. Patient groups were similar in respect of anthropometric data. The indication for using the semi-rigid technique was a fairly stable intraoperative situation; for the more common unstable situations, the rigid technique was chosen. Selecting implant rigidity on these criteria led to results with an improvement rate well within the upper success range reported in the literature. Among people in employment, a lengthy preoperative sick leave was an important predictor for unsatisfactory outcome.

摘要

在一项对94例患者进行了3年随访的前瞻性队列研究中,通过三种既定评分评估了用于腰椎融合的刚性和半刚性经椎弓根器械的疗效。患者组在人体测量数据方面相似。使用半刚性技术的指征是术中情况相当稳定;对于更常见的不稳定情况,则选择刚性技术。根据这些标准选择植入物的刚性,其结果的改善率完全在文献报道的较高成功范围内。在就业人群中,术前长时间病假是预后不佳的重要预测因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion.腰椎融合术中单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 15;25(14):1843-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00017.
7
Meta-analysis of the results of lumbar spine fusion.腰椎融合术结果的荟萃分析。
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:120-2. doi: 10.3109/17453679309160140.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验