Smith Kelly, Winegard Karen, Hicks Audrey L, McCartney Neil
Dept. of Kinesiology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1.
Can J Appl Physiol. 2003 Jun;28(3):462-74. doi: 10.1139/h03-034.
Dynamic muscle strength (1-RM) and symptom-limited treadmill endurance were compared among three groups (5 M and 5 F per group) of older adults (mean age 72.5 yrs) who had either weight-trained continuously twice per week for 5 years (Tr), ceased to weight train after 2 years (Detr), or acted as controls throughout (Con). The Tr and Detr trained hard (progressing up to 3 sets at up to 80% of 1-RM) for 2 years; the Tr continued training for an additional 3 years at a maintenance level (2 to 3 sets at 60-70% 1-RM), whereas the Detr stopped training for those 3 years. The Con subjects did not train for the duration of the study but took part in identical testing procedures. After 2 years of resistance training, dynamic strength in the Tr and Detr groups increased significantly above baseline and Con values for all exercises, p < 0.0001. Following 3 years of maintenance level training, arm curl, leg press, and bench press 1-RM (sum of both limbs) in the Tr remained significantly above baseline values (21.6 kg = 17%; 15.7 kg = 82%; 8.3 kg = 34%, respectively). The 1-RM in Detr were 18.4 kg (14%), 5.3 kg (24%), and 1.4 kg (9%) above baseline for leg press, arm curl, and bench press after 5 years, whereas the Con declined over the 5-yr period by 18.4 kg (-9.7%), 4.4 kg (-19%), and 3.5 kg (-6%), respectively. There were nonsignificant improvements in treadmill performance in the Tr and Detr, and a decline in the Con after 2 years. Treadmill performance declined between Years 2 and 5 in all groups despite continued training (ns). We conclude that: (1) dynamic strength gains from 2 years of resistance training in older individuals are not entirely lost even after 3 years of detering; (2) these effects may be specific to the exercises performed in the training program; (3) adoption of maintenance-level moderate-intensity training significantly attenuates the decline in dynamic strength of previously trained muscles.
对三组(每组5名男性和5名女性)平均年龄为72.5岁的老年人进行了动态肌肉力量(1-RM)和症状限制跑步机耐力测试。这三组老年人中,一组连续两年每周进行两次重量训练,共持续5年(Tr组);一组在两年后停止重量训练(Detr组);另一组在整个过程中作为对照组(Con组)。Tr组和Detr组在两年内进行高强度训练(逐渐增加到3组,每组达到1-RM的80%);Tr组在接下来的3年以维持水平继续训练(2至3组,每组为1-RM的60-70%),而Detr组在这3年停止训练。Con组在研究期间未进行训练,但参与相同的测试程序。经过两年的阻力训练后,Tr组和Detr组所有练习的动态力量均显著高于基线水平和Con组,p<0.0001。经过3年的维持水平训练后,Tr组的臂弯举、腿举和卧推1-RM(双侧肢体总和)仍显著高于基线值(分别为21.6千克=17%;15.7千克=82%;8.3千克=34%)。5年后,Detr组的腿举、臂弯举和卧推1-RM分别比基线高出18.4千克(14%)、5.3千克(24%)和1.4千克(9%),而Con组在5年期间分别下降了18.4千克(-9.7%)、4.4千克(-19%)和3.5千克(-6%)。Tr组和Detr组的跑步机性能有不显著的改善,而Con组在两年后出现下降。尽管继续训练,但所有组在第2年至第5年期间跑步机性能均下降(无显著性差异)。我们得出以下结论:(1)老年人经过两年阻力训练获得的动态力量即使在停止训练3年后也不会完全丧失;(2)这些影响可能特定于训练计划中进行的练习;(3)采用维持水平的中等强度训练可显著减缓先前训练肌肉的动态力量下降。