Neuromuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research (CESSR), Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.
Exp Gerontol. 2017 Nov;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
There is controversy in the literature regarding the dose-response relationship of strength training in healthy older participants. The present study determined training frequency effects on maximum strength, muscle mass and functional capacity over 6months following an initial 3-month preparatory strength training period. One-hundred and six 64-75year old volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four groups; performing strength training one (EX1), two (EX2), or three (EX3) times per week and a non-training control (CON) group. Whole-body strength training was performed using 2-5 sets and 4-12 repetitions per exercise and 7-9 exercises per session. Before and after the intervention, maximum dynamic leg press (1-RM) and isometric knee extensor and plantarflexor strength, body composition and quadriceps cross-sectional area, as well as functional capacity (maximum 7.5m forward and backward walking speed, timed-up-and-go test, loaded 10-stair climb test) were measured. All experimental groups increased leg press 1-RM more than CON (EX1: 3±8%, EX2: 6±6%, EX3: 10±8%, CON: -3±6%, P<0.05) and EX3 improved more than EX1 (P=0.007) at month 9. Compared to CON, EX3 improved in backward walk (P=0.047) and EX1 in timed-up-and-go (P=0.029) tests. No significant changes occurred in body composition. The present study found no evidence that higher training frequency would induce greater benefit to maximum walking speed (i.e. functional capacity) despite a clear dose-response in dynamic 1-RM strength, at least when predominantly using machine weight-training. It appears that beneficial functional capacity improvements can be achieved through low frequency training (i.e. 1-2 times per week) in previously untrained healthy older participants.
关于健康老年人参与者的力量训练剂量-反应关系,文献中存在争议。本研究旨在确定经过 3 个月的预备力量训练期后,6 个月内训练频率对最大力量、肌肉质量和功能能力的影响。106 名 64-75 岁的志愿者被随机分配到四组中的一组;每周进行一次(EX1)、两次(EX2)或三次(EX3)力量训练,以及一个非训练对照组(CON)。全身力量训练采用 2-5 组,每组 4-12 次重复,每次训练 7-9 个动作。干预前后,测量了最大动态腿部按压(1-RM)和等长膝关节伸肌和跖屈肌力量、身体成分和股四头肌横截面积以及功能能力(最大 7.5m 前后步行速度、计时起立行走测试、负载 10 级楼梯攀爬测试)。所有实验组的腿部按压 1-RM 均高于 CON(EX1:3±8%,EX2:6±6%,EX3:10±8%,CON:-3±6%,P<0.05),EX3 在第 9 个月时的改善程度高于 EX1(P=0.007)。与 CON 相比,EX3 在后向行走(P=0.047)和 EX1 在计时起立行走测试(P=0.029)中有所改善。身体成分没有显著变化。本研究没有发现更高的训练频率会导致最大步行速度(即功能能力)更大的益处,尽管在动态 1-RM 力量方面存在明显的剂量反应,但至少当主要使用机器重量训练时,情况确实如此。这表明,在以前未经训练的健康老年人参与者中,低频率训练(即每周 1-2 次)可以实现有益的功能能力改善。