Suppr超能文献

不同强度训练频率对健康老年人最大力量、身体成分和功能能力的影响。

Effects of different strength training frequencies on maximum strength, body composition and functional capacity in healthy older individuals.

机构信息

Neuromuscular Research Center, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research (CESSR), Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.

出版信息

Exp Gerontol. 2017 Nov;98:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 15.

Abstract

There is controversy in the literature regarding the dose-response relationship of strength training in healthy older participants. The present study determined training frequency effects on maximum strength, muscle mass and functional capacity over 6months following an initial 3-month preparatory strength training period. One-hundred and six 64-75year old volunteers were randomly assigned to one of four groups; performing strength training one (EX1), two (EX2), or three (EX3) times per week and a non-training control (CON) group. Whole-body strength training was performed using 2-5 sets and 4-12 repetitions per exercise and 7-9 exercises per session. Before and after the intervention, maximum dynamic leg press (1-RM) and isometric knee extensor and plantarflexor strength, body composition and quadriceps cross-sectional area, as well as functional capacity (maximum 7.5m forward and backward walking speed, timed-up-and-go test, loaded 10-stair climb test) were measured. All experimental groups increased leg press 1-RM more than CON (EX1: 3±8%, EX2: 6±6%, EX3: 10±8%, CON: -3±6%, P<0.05) and EX3 improved more than EX1 (P=0.007) at month 9. Compared to CON, EX3 improved in backward walk (P=0.047) and EX1 in timed-up-and-go (P=0.029) tests. No significant changes occurred in body composition. The present study found no evidence that higher training frequency would induce greater benefit to maximum walking speed (i.e. functional capacity) despite a clear dose-response in dynamic 1-RM strength, at least when predominantly using machine weight-training. It appears that beneficial functional capacity improvements can be achieved through low frequency training (i.e. 1-2 times per week) in previously untrained healthy older participants.

摘要

关于健康老年人参与者的力量训练剂量-反应关系,文献中存在争议。本研究旨在确定经过 3 个月的预备力量训练期后,6 个月内训练频率对最大力量、肌肉质量和功能能力的影响。106 名 64-75 岁的志愿者被随机分配到四组中的一组;每周进行一次(EX1)、两次(EX2)或三次(EX3)力量训练,以及一个非训练对照组(CON)。全身力量训练采用 2-5 组,每组 4-12 次重复,每次训练 7-9 个动作。干预前后,测量了最大动态腿部按压(1-RM)和等长膝关节伸肌和跖屈肌力量、身体成分和股四头肌横截面积以及功能能力(最大 7.5m 前后步行速度、计时起立行走测试、负载 10 级楼梯攀爬测试)。所有实验组的腿部按压 1-RM 均高于 CON(EX1:3±8%,EX2:6±6%,EX3:10±8%,CON:-3±6%,P<0.05),EX3 在第 9 个月时的改善程度高于 EX1(P=0.007)。与 CON 相比,EX3 在后向行走(P=0.047)和 EX1 在计时起立行走测试(P=0.029)中有所改善。身体成分没有显著变化。本研究没有发现更高的训练频率会导致最大步行速度(即功能能力)更大的益处,尽管在动态 1-RM 力量方面存在明显的剂量反应,但至少当主要使用机器重量训练时,情况确实如此。这表明,在以前未经训练的健康老年人参与者中,低频率训练(即每周 1-2 次)可以实现有益的功能能力改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验