Qin Xuan, Emerson Julia, Stapp Jenny, Stapp Lynn, Abe Patrick, Burns Jane L
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Therapeutics Development Network Resource Center for Microbiology, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Sep;41(9):4312-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4312-4317.2003.
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) may be difficult to identify because of their marked phenotypic diversity. We examined 200 gram-negative clinical isolates from CF respiratory tract specimens and compared identification by biochemical testing and real-time PCR with multiple different target sequences using a standardized combination of biochemical testing and molecular identification, including 16S rRNA partial sequencing and gyrB PCR and sequencing as a "gold standard." Of 50 isolates easily identified phenotypically as P. aeruginosa, all were positive with PCR primers for gyrB or oprI, 98% were positive with exotoxin A primers, and 90% were positive with algD primers. Of 50 P. aeruginosa isolates that could be identified by basic biochemical testing, 100% were positive by real-time PCR with gyrB or oprI primers, 96% were positive with exotoxin A primers, and 92% were positive with algD primers. For isolates requiring more-extensive biochemical evaluation, 13 isolates were identified as P. aeruginosa; all 13 were positive with gyrB primers, 12 of 13 were positive with oprI primers, 11 of 13 were positive with exotoxin A primers, and 10 of 13 were positive with algD primers. A single false-positive P. aeruginosa result was seen with oprI primers. The best-performing commercial biochemical testing was in exact agreement with molecular identification only 60% of the time for this most difficult group. Real-time PCR had costs similar to those of commercial biochemical testing but a much shorter turnaround time. Given the diversity of these CF isolates, real-time PCR with a combination of two target sequences appears to be the optimum choice for identification of atypical P. aeruginosa and for non-P. aeruginosa gram-negative isolates.
由于其显著的表型多样性,铜绿假单胞菌和来自囊性纤维化(CF)患者的其他革兰氏阴性菌分离株可能难以鉴定。我们检查了200株来自CF呼吸道标本的革兰氏阴性临床分离株,并使用包括16S rRNA部分测序、gyrB PCR和测序作为“金标准”的生化测试和分子鉴定的标准化组合,比较了通过生化测试和使用多个不同靶序列的实时PCR进行的鉴定。在50株表型上容易鉴定为铜绿假单胞菌的分离株中,所有菌株的gyrB或oprI PCR引物均为阳性,98%的菌株外毒素A引物为阳性,90%的菌株algD引物为阳性。在50株可通过基本生化测试鉴定的铜绿假单胞菌分离株中,100%的菌株使用gyrB或oprI引物进行实时PCR为阳性,96%的菌株外毒素A引物为阳性,92%的菌株algD引物为阳性。对于需要更广泛生化评估的分离株,有13株被鉴定为铜绿假单胞菌;所有13株gyrB引物均为阳性,13株中有12株oprI引物为阳性,13株中有11株外毒素A引物为阳性,13株中有10株algD引物为阳性。oprI引物出现了一例假阳性铜绿假单胞菌结果。对于这个最困难的组,性能最佳的商业生化测试仅60%的时间与分子鉴定完全一致。实时PCR的成本与商业生化测试相似,但周转时间要短得多。鉴于这些CF分离株的多样性,结合两个靶序列的实时PCR似乎是鉴定非典型铜绿假单胞菌和非铜绿假单胞菌革兰氏阴性菌分离株的最佳选择。