Church Christopher A, Chiu Alexander G, Vaughan Winston C
Stanford Sinus Center, Division of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Sep;129(3):204-9. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(03)00521-7.
To evaluate the management of patients with large skull base defects (> 2 cm) and intracranial injury caused by powered endoscopic sinus surgery. Study design and setting All patients treated for postendoscopic sinus surgery skull base injury over a 4-year period were reviewed.
Three patients with skull base defects greater than 2 cm in size and associated intracranial injury from powered ESS were identified. All patients presented with active cerebrospinal fluid leaks. CT scans showed intracranial injury and pathology reports revealed brain tissue removal. Using image-guided endoscopic techniques, all defects were addressed with multilayer repair. Closure was achieved in all patients on the first attempt, with an average follow-up of 27 months.
The use of powered instrumentation along the skull base can be dangerous and can result in extensive skull base defects with associated loss of dura and gray matter. Large ethmoid roof defects and significant intracranial injury, however, are not absolute contraindications to endoscopic repair.
评估动力性鼻内镜鼻窦手术所致大的颅底缺损(>2cm)及颅内损伤患者的治疗情况。研究设计与背景:回顾了4年间所有因鼻内镜鼻窦手术后颅底损伤接受治疗的患者。
确定了3例动力性鼻内镜鼻窦手术导致颅底缺损大于2cm且伴有颅内损伤的患者。所有患者均出现活动性脑脊液漏。CT扫描显示颅内损伤,病理报告显示有脑组织切除。采用影像引导下的鼻内镜技术,对所有缺损进行了多层修复。所有患者首次尝试均成功封闭缺损,平均随访27个月。
沿颅底使用动力器械可能具有危险性,可导致广泛的颅底缺损并伴有硬脑膜和灰质缺失。然而,大的筛骨顶壁缺损和严重的颅内损伤并非内镜修复的绝对禁忌证。