• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过语义差异量表,由未经训练的和经验丰富的评判者对食管气管语音进行感知评估。

Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales.

作者信息

van As Corina J, Koopmans-van Beinum Florien J, Pols Louis C W, Hilgers Frans J M

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Aug;46(4):947-59. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/074).

DOI:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/074)
PMID:12959472
Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech by means of perceptual evaluations and to develop a clinically useful subset of perceptual scales sufficient for these perceptual evaluations. The perceptual ratings were obtained from both naive and trained raters (speech-language pathologists [SLPs]) after listening to a read-aloud text. The perceptual evaluations were performed by means of 19 semantic bipolar 7-point scales for the naive raters and 20 semantic bipolar 7-point scales for the trained raters. The trained raters were also asked to judge the overall voice quality as good, reasonable, or poor. Both naive listeners and trained SLPs were able to perform reliable perceptual judgments. Naive raters judged the tracheoesophageal voice as more deviant than the trained raters did. Naive raters made judgments based on 2 underlying perceptual dimensions (voice quality and pitch), whereas the trained raters made judgments based on 4 underlying perceptual dimensions (voice quality, tonicity, pitch, and tempo). These perceptual dimensions were further subdivided into a subset of 4 perceptual scales for the naive raters and a subset of 8 perceptual scales for the trained raters. This appeared to provide a sufficient coverage of the underlying perceptual dimensions used by the listeners.

摘要

本研究旨在通过感知评估来调查气管食管语音的语音质量,并开发一套对这些感知评估足够有用的临床感知量表子集。在聆听一段朗读文本后,从未经训练的评分者和经过训练的评分者(言语语言病理学家[SLP])那里获得感知评分。感知评估通过19个语义双极7点量表对未经训练的评分者进行,以及20个语义双极7点量表对经过训练的评分者进行。还要求经过训练的评分者将整体语音质量判断为好、一般或差。未经训练的听众和经过训练的SLP都能够进行可靠的感知判断。未经训练的评分者判断气管食管语音比经过训练的评分者认为的更偏离正常。未经训练的评分者基于2个潜在的感知维度(语音质量和音高)进行判断,而经过训练的评分者基于4个潜在的感知维度(语音质量、张力、音高和节奏)进行判断。这些感知维度进一步细分为未经训练的评分者的4个感知量表子集和经过训练的评分者的8个感知量表子集。这似乎为听众使用的潜在感知维度提供了足够的覆盖范围。

相似文献

1
Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales.通过语义差异量表,由未经训练的和经验丰富的评判者对食管气管语音进行感知评估。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Aug;46(4):947-59. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/074).
2
Can we perceptually rate alaryngeal voice? Developing the Sunderland Tracheoesophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.我们能否对人工发声进行感知评估?开发桑德兰德气管食管发声感知量表。
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec;34(6):533-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02034.x.
3
Perceptual Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality With the SToPS: The Development of a Reliable and Valid Tool.SToPS 感知评估在气管食管发声质量评估中的应用:一种可靠且有效的工具的开发。
J Voice. 2019 Jul;33(4):465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
4
Auditory-perceptual scaling and quality of life in tracheoesophageal speakers.食管气管造口发音者的听觉感知量表与生活质量
Laryngoscope. 2004 Apr;114(4):753-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00030.
5
Effects of listener sophistication on judgements of tracheoesophageal talker intelligibility.听众成熟度对食管气管造口术讲话者可懂度判断的影响。
J Commun Disord. 1989 Apr;22(2):105-13. doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(89)90027-0.
6
Reliability in perceptual analysis of voice quality.嗓音质量感知分析中的可靠性。
J Voice. 2005 Dec;19(4):555-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.08.008.
7
Speech and voice after laryngectomy: perceptual and acoustical analyses of tracheoesophageal speech related to voice handicap index.喉切除术后的言语与嗓音:与嗓音障碍指数相关的食管气管发音的感知与声学分析
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011;63(2):98-108. doi: 10.1159/000319740. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
8
Automatic modelling of perceptual judges in the context of head and neck cancer speech intelligibility.头颈部癌症言语可懂度感知判断的自动建模。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1422-1435. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13004. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
9
Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of pleasantness and severity in dysphonic and normal speakers.嗓音障碍患者与正常嗓音者愉悦度和严重程度的直接量级估计与区间标度
J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Dec;112(6):3014-21. doi: 10.1121/1.1518983.
10
Acceptability ratings of tracheoesophageal speech.气管食管语音的可接受性评分
Laryngoscope. 1988 Apr;98(4):394-7. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198804000-00007.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Noise on Relationships Between Speech Intelligibility and Self-Reported Communication Measures in Tracheoesophageal Speakers.噪声对食管气管造口发音者言语可懂度与自我报告的沟通指标之间关系的影响。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Aug 1;25(3):393-407. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0081.
2
Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.全喉切除术后的人工喉语音康复
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Apr;1(2):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s13193-010-0028-4. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
3
Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: development and evaluation of the (I)INFVo rating scale.
替代语音的感知评估:(I)INFVo评分量表的开发与评估
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Feb;263(2):183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00405-005-0960-z. Epub 2005 Jun 25.