Pindzola R H, Cain B H
Department of Communication Disorders, Auburn University, AL 36849.
Laryngoscope. 1988 Apr;98(4):394-7. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198804000-00007.
Thirty-one naive listeners rated the intelligibility and acceptability of tracheoesophageal, esophageal, and normal laryngeal speech of 15 adult speakers. Intelligibility was measured using a multiple-choice word test while acceptability was rated on a seven-point equal-appearing interval scale. Judgments were made on the features of fluency, pitch/quality, speech rate, inflection, and overall acceptability. Tracheoesophageal speech was found not to differ significantly from normal speech in intelligibility, rate, and inflection, but was less acceptable for fluency, pitch/quality and overall acceptability. Tracheoesophageal speech was more acceptable than esophageal speech for all features measured.
31名未接触过相关语音的听众对15名成年说话者的气管食管音、食管音和正常喉音的可懂度和可接受度进行了评分。可懂度通过多项选择单词测试来衡量，而可接受度则根据七点等距量表进行评分。评判基于流畅性、音高/音质、语速、语调变化和总体可接受度等特征。结果发现，气管食管音在可懂度、语速和语调变化方面与正常语音没有显著差异，但在流畅性、音高/音质和总体可接受度方面的可接受度较低。在所测量的所有特征方面，气管食管音比食管音更易于接受。
