Colburn Wayne A, Lee Jean W
MDS Pharma Services, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(12):997-1022. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342120-00001.
Four elements are crucial to successful pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modelling and simulation for efficient and effective rational drug development: (i) mechanism-based biomarker selection and correlation to clinical endpoints; (ii) quantification of drug and/or metabolites in biological fluids under good laboratory practices (GLP); (iii) GLP-like biomarker method validation and measurements and; (iv) mechanism-based PK/PD modelling and validation. Biomarkers can provide great predictive value in early drug development if they reflect the mechanism of action for the intervention even if they do not become surrogate endpoints. PK/PD modelling and simulation can play a critical role in this process. Data from genomic and proteomics differentiating healthy versus disease states lead to biomarker discovery and identification. Multiple genes control complex diseases via hosts of gene products in biometabolic pathways and cell/organ signal transduction. Pilot exploratory studies should be conducted to identify pivotal biomarkers to be used for predictive clinical assessment of disease progression and the effect of drug intervention. Most biomarkers are endogenous macromolecules, which could be measured in biological fluids. Many exist in heterogeneous forms with varying activity and immunoreactivity, posting challenges for bioanalysis. Reliable and selective assays could be validated under a GLP-like environment for quantitative methods. While the need for consistent reference standards and quality control monitoring during sample analysis for biomarker assays are similar to that of drug molecules, many biomarkers have special requirements for sample collection that demand a well coordinated team management. Bioanalytical methods should be validated to meet study objectives at various drug development stages, and possess adequate performance to quantify biochemical responses specific to the target disease progression and drug intervention. Protocol design to produce sufficient data for PK/PD modelling would be more complex than that of PK. Knowledge of mechanism from discovery and preclinical studies are helpful for planning clinical study designs in cascade, sequential, crossover or replicate mode. The appropriate combination of biomarker identification and selection, bioanalytical methods development and validation for drugs and biomarkers, and mechanism-based PK/PD models for fitting data and predicting future clinical endpoints/outcomes provide powerful insights and guidance for effective and efficient rational drug development, toward safe and efficacious medicine for individual patients.
对于高效且有效的合理药物研发而言,成功进行药代动力学-药效学(PK/PD)建模与模拟有四个关键要素:(i)基于机制的生物标志物选择以及与临床终点的相关性;(ii)在良好实验室规范(GLP)下对生物体液中的药物和/或代谢物进行定量;(iii)类似GLP的生物标志物方法验证与测量;以及(iv)基于机制的PK/PD建模与验证。生物标志物如果能反映干预措施的作用机制,即便它们未成为替代终点,也能在药物早期研发中提供巨大的预测价值。PK/PD建模与模拟在此过程中可发挥关键作用。来自基因组学和蛋白质组学的区分健康与疾病状态的数据促使生物标志物的发现与识别。多种基因通过生物代谢途径和细胞/器官信号转导中的大量基因产物控制复杂疾病。应开展初步探索性研究以识别关键生物标志物,用于疾病进展和药物干预效果的预测性临床评估。大多数生物标志物是内源性大分子,可在生物体液中进行测量。许多生物标志物以具有不同活性和免疫反应性的异质形式存在,给生物分析带来挑战。可靠且具选择性的检测方法可在类似GLP的环境下针对定量方法进行验证。虽然生物标志物检测的样品分析过程中对一致的参考标准和质量控制监测的需求与药物分子类似,但许多生物标志物对样品采集有特殊要求,这需要一个协调良好的团队管理。生物分析方法应进行验证,以满足药物研发各阶段的研究目标,并具备足够的性能来定量针对目标疾病进展和药物干预的特定生化反应。为PK/PD建模生成足够数据的方案设计将比PK的方案设计更为复杂。来自发现和临床前研究的机制知识有助于按级联、序贯、交叉或重复模式规划临床研究设计。生物标志物识别与选择、药物和生物标志物的生物分析方法开发与验证以及用于拟合数据和预测未来临床终点/结果的基于机制的PK/PD模型的适当组合,为有效且高效的合理药物研发提供了有力的见解和指导,以实现为个体患者提供安全有效的药物。