Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010 May 15;245(1):134-42. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2010.02.011. Epub 2010 Feb 26.
Biomarkers are biometric measurements that provide critical quantitative information about the biological condition of the animal or individual being tested. In drug safety studies, established toxicity biomarkers are used along with other conventional study data to determine dose-limiting organ toxicity, and to define species sensitivity for new chemical entities intended for possible use as human medicines. A continuing goal of drug safety scientists in the pharmaceutical industry is to discover and develop better trans-species biomarkers that can be used to determine target organ toxicities for preclinical species in short-term studies at dose levels that are some multiple of the intended human dose and again later in full development for monitoring clinical trials at lower therapeutic doses. Of particular value are early, predictive, noninvasive biomarkers that have in vitro, in vivo, and clinical transferability. Such translational biomarkers bridge animal testing used in preclinical science and human studies that are part of subsequent clinical testing. Although suitable for in vivo preclinical regulatory studies, conventional hepatic safety biomarkers are basically confirmatory markers because they signal organ toxicity after some pathological damage has occurred, and are therefore not well-suited for short-term, predictive screening assays early in the discovery-to-development progression of new chemical entities (NCEs) available in limited quantities. Efforts between regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical industry are underway for the coordinated discovery, qualification, verification and validation of early predictive toxicity biomarkers. Early predictive safety biomarkers are those that are detectable and quantifiable prior to the onset of irreversible tissue injury and which are associated with a mechanism of action relevant to a specific type of potential hepatic injury. Potential drug toxicity biomarkers are typically endogenous macromolecules in biological fluids with varying immunoreactivity which can present bioanalytical challenges when first discovered. The potential success of these efforts is greatly enhanced by recent advances in two closely linked technologies, toxicoproteomics and targeted, quantitative mass spectrometry. This review focuses on the examination of the current status of these technologies as they relate to the discovery and development of novel preclinical biomarkers of hepatotoxicity. A critical assessment of the current literature reveals two distinct lines of safety biomarker investigation, (1) peripheral fluid biomarkers of organ toxicity and (2) tissue or cell-based toxicity signatures. Improved peripheral fluid biomarkers should allow the sensitive detection of potential organ toxicity prior to the onset of overt organ pathology. Advancements in tissue or cell-based toxicity biomarkers will provide sensitive in vitro or ex vivo screening systems based on toxicity pathway markers. An examination of the current practices in clinical pathology and the critical evaluation of some recently proposed biomarker candidates in comparison to the desired characteristics of an ideal toxicity biomarker lead this author to conclude that a combination of selected biomarkers will be more informative if not predictive of potential animal organ toxicity than any single biomarker, new or old. For the practical assessment of combinations of conventional and/or novel toxicity biomarkers in rodent and large animal preclinical species, mass spectrometry has emerged as the premier analytical tool compared to specific immunoassays or functional assays. Selected and multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry applications make it possible for this same basic technology to be used in the progressive stages of biomarker discovery, development, and more importantly, routine study applications without the use of specific antibody reagents. This technology combined with other "omics" technologies can provide added selectivity and sensitivity in preclinical drug safety testing.
生物标志物是提供有关受试动物或个体生物状况的关键定量信息的生物计量测量。在药物安全性研究中,使用既定的毒性生物标志物以及其他常规研究数据来确定剂量限制器官毒性,并确定新化学实体的物种敏感性,这些新化学实体可能被用作人类药物。药物安全性科学家在制药行业的持续目标是发现和开发更好的跨物种生物标志物,这些标志物可用于在短期研究中确定临床前物种的靶器官毒性,剂量水平为预期人类剂量的若干倍数,并且在后期完全开发时用于监测较低治疗剂量的临床试验。特别有价值的是早期、预测性、非侵入性生物标志物,这些标志物具有体外、体内和临床可转移性。这些转化生物标志物连接了用于临床前科学的动物测试和作为后续临床测试一部分的人类研究。虽然适合于体内临床前监管研究,但常规的肝安全性生物标志物基本上是确认性标志物,因为它们在发生某些病理损伤后发出器官毒性信号,因此不适合在新化学实体(NCE)的发现到开发进展的早期进行短期、预测性筛选试验,这些 NCE 的数量有限。监管机构和制药行业之间正在进行协调发现、鉴定、验证和验证早期预测性毒性生物标志物的努力。早期预测性安全性生物标志物是那些在不可逆组织损伤发生之前可检测和定量的生物标志物,并且与特定类型的潜在肝损伤的作用机制相关。潜在的药物毒性生物标志物通常是生物体液中的内源性大分子,其免疫反应性不同,在首次发现时可能会带来生物分析挑战。最近在两种紧密相关的技术(毒理学蛋白质组学和靶向、定量质谱)方面的进展极大地增强了这些工作的成功机会。这篇综述重点介绍了这些技术在发现和开发新型临床前肝毒性生物标志物方面的现状。对当前文献的批判性评估揭示了两种截然不同的安全生物标志物研究线,(1)器官毒性的外周液生物标志物,(2)组织或基于细胞的毒性特征。改进的外周液生物标志物应能够在明显的器官病理学发生之前敏感地检测到潜在的器官毒性。组织或基于细胞的毒性生物标志物的进步将提供基于毒性途径标志物的敏感的体外或离体筛选系统。对临床病理学当前实践的检查以及与理想毒性生物标志物的期望特征进行的一些最近提出的生物标志物候选物的批判性评估使作者得出结论,与任何单个生物标志物(无论是新的还是旧的)相比,选择的生物标志物的组合将提供更有信息,而不是预测潜在的动物器官毒性。为了在啮齿动物和大动物临床前物种中实际评估常规和/或新型毒性生物标志物的组合,与特定免疫测定或功能测定相比,质谱已经成为首选的分析工具。选定的和多重反应监测质谱应用使这项基本技术能够在生物标志物发现、开发的各个阶段以及更重要的是,在常规研究应用中使用,而无需使用特定的抗体试剂。这项技术与其他“组学”技术相结合,可以在临床前药物安全性测试中提供更高的选择性和敏感性。