Suppr超能文献

吸入吗啡对拇囊炎切除术后患者的镇痛效果。

Analgesic efficacy of inhaled morphine in patients after bunionectomy surgery.

作者信息

Thipphawong John B, Babul Najib, Morishige Richard J, Findlay Hugh K, Reber Keith R, Millward Gary J, Otulana Babatunde A

机构信息

Aradigm Corporation, Hayward, California 94545, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2003 Sep;99(3):693-700; discussion 6A. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200309000-00026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The AERx Pain Management System (Aradigm Corporation, Hayward, CA) is a novel pulmonary delivery system for the systemic administration of morphine. The authors compared the relative analgesic efficacy and safety of the AERx Pain Management System with those of placebo and intravenous morphine in an orthopedic postsurgical pain model.

METHODS

Eighty-nine male and female PS-1 to PS-3 patients underwent standardized bunionectomy surgery and received multiple doses of inhaled or intravenous placebo, inhaled morphine (one inhalation [2.2 mg] or three inhalations [6.6 mg]), or intravenous morphine (4 mg) in a blinded fashion. Open-label rescue morphine (2 mg) was also available as needed. Pain intensity, pain relief, and time to pain relief were measured after the first dose. Global evaluation, morphine consumption, vital signs, and adverse events were monitored for 8 h after treatment. Blinded study personnel performed all treatment administrations and pain assessments.

RESULTS

Three inhalations of morphine and 4 mg intravenous morphine provided comparable single- and multiple-dose analgesia. One inhalation of morphine was statistically indistinguishable from placebo. Three inhalations of morphine and 4 mg intravenous morphine both consistently demonstrated significantly greater analgesic efficacy than did placebo and one inhalation of morphine.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparable analgesic efficacy was demonstrated between a carefully matched dose of inhaled and intravenous morphine in a postsurgical pain model.

摘要

背景

AERx疼痛管理系统(阿瑞迪姆公司,加利福尼亚州海沃德)是一种用于全身给药吗啡的新型肺部给药系统。作者在骨科术后疼痛模型中比较了AERx疼痛管理系统与安慰剂和静脉注射吗啡的相对镇痛效果及安全性。

方法

89例PS-1至PS-3级的男性和女性患者接受了标准化的拇囊炎切除术,并以盲法接受多剂量吸入或静脉注射安慰剂、吸入吗啡(一次吸入[2.2毫克]或三次吸入[6.6毫克])或静脉注射吗啡(4毫克)。必要时也可使用开放标签的急救吗啡(2毫克)。在首次给药后测量疼痛强度、疼痛缓解情况及疼痛缓解时间。治疗后8小时监测整体评估、吗啡消耗量、生命体征及不良事件。由盲法研究人员进行所有治疗给药及疼痛评估。

结果

三次吸入吗啡和4毫克静脉注射吗啡提供了相当的单剂量和多剂量镇痛效果。一次吸入吗啡在统计学上与安慰剂无差异。三次吸入吗啡和4毫克静脉注射吗啡均始终显示出比安慰剂和一次吸入吗啡显著更高的镇痛效果。

结论

在术后疼痛模型中,精心匹配剂量的吸入吗啡和静脉注射吗啡显示出相当的镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验