Suppr超能文献

药学继续教育资料的使用与效果

Use and effectiveness of pharmacy continuing-education materials.

作者信息

Maio Vittorio, Belazi Dea, Goldfarb Neil I, Phillips Amy L, Crawford Albert G

机构信息

Office of Health Policy and Clinical Outcomes, Thomas Jefferson University, 1015 Walnut Street, Suite 115, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003 Aug 15;60(16):1644-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.16.1644.

Abstract

The use and effectiveness of pharmacy continuing-education (CE) materials were studied. A 31-item survey was administered to pharmacists via an Internet portal. A recruitment letter, which included a description of the study and the Internet address to access the survey, was mailed to 2000 pharmacists. Only pharmacists who were currently practicing pharmacy in a community pharmacy or in a health care setting were included in the analysis. Pharmacists were asked to indicate the format of CE they generally used, formats used in the six months prior to the survey, and the format of their most recent CE. They were also asked to assess the effectiveness of CE programs and their ability to enhance pharmacists' knowledge and clinical practice behavior. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. Chi-square analyses were performed to compare subgroup responses. Of the 373 pharmacists completing the survey, 365 met the inclusion criteria. Of these respondents, 31% worked in a chain pharmacy, 25% in an inpatient pharmacy, and 23% in an independent pharmacy. Pharmacists most commonly obtained CE from printed materials (92%), lectures and seminars (75%), Internet-based materials (53%), and symposia (44%). Respondents found all types of CE programs effective in improving their knowledge, but less effective in enhancing their clinical practice behavior. Pharmacists perceived different types of CE programs as valuable resources for their educational needs. Printed materials, lectures, and seminars were the most commonly used CE formats. Pharmacists considered CE programs very effective in enhancing their knowledge and less valuable in improving their pharmacy practice activities.

摘要

对药学继续教育(CE)材料的使用情况及有效性进行了研究。通过互联网门户向药剂师发放了一份包含31个条目的调查问卷。一封介绍研究内容及调查问卷网址的招募信被邮寄给了2000名药剂师。仅将目前在社区药房或医疗保健机构从事药学工作的药剂师纳入分析。药剂师被要求指出他们通常使用的CE形式、调查前六个月使用的形式以及他们最近一次CE的形式。他们还被要求评估CE项目的有效性以及这些项目增强药剂师知识和临床实践行为的能力。对所有变量进行了描述性统计。进行卡方分析以比较亚组的回答。在完成调查的373名药剂师中,365名符合纳入标准。在这些受访者中,31%在连锁药房工作,25%在住院药房工作,23%在独立药房工作。药剂师最常通过印刷材料(92%)、讲座和研讨会(75%)、基于互联网的材料(53%)以及专题讨论会(44%)获得CE。受访者发现所有类型的CE项目在提高他们的知识方面都有效,但在增强他们的临床实践行为方面效果较差。药剂师认为不同类型的CE项目是满足他们教育需求的宝贵资源。印刷材料、讲座和研讨会是最常用的CE形式。药剂师认为CE项目在增强他们的知识方面非常有效,而在改善他们的药学实践活动方面价值较小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验