• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用连续剂量反应信息进行风险评估的基准计算:方差的影响及临界值的确定

Benchmark calculations in risk assessment using continuous dose-response information: the influence of variance and the determination of a cut-off value.

作者信息

Sand Salomon J, von Rosen Dietrich, Filipsson Agneta Falk

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2003 Oct;23(5):1059-68. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00381.

DOI:10.1111/1539-6924.00381
PMID:12969419
Abstract

A benchmark dose (BMD) is the dose of a chemical that corresponds to a predetermined increase in the response (the benchmark response, BMR) of a health effect. In this article, a method (the hybrid approach) for benchmark calculations from continuous dose-response information is investigated. In the formulation of the methodology, a cut-off value for an adverse health effect has to be determined. It is shown that the influence of variance on the hybrid model depends on the choice of determination of the cut-off point. If the cut-off value is determined as corresponding to a specified tail proportion of the control distribution, P(0), the BMD becomes biased upward when the variance is biased upward. On the contrary, if the cut-off value is directly determined to some level of the continuous response variable, the BMD becomes biased upward when the variance is biased downward. A simulation study was also performed in which the accuracy and precision of the BMD was compared for the two ways of determining the cut-off value. In general, considering BMRs of 1, 5, and 10% (additional risk) the precision of the BMD became higher when the cut-off value was estimated by specifying P(0), relative to the case with a direct determination. Use of the square-root of the maximum-likelihood estimator of the variance in BMD estimation may provide a bias that is reflected by the cut-off formulation (downward bias if specifying P(0), and upward bias if specifying the cut-off, c, directly). This feature may be reduced if an unbiased estimator of the standard deviation is used in the calculations.

摘要

基准剂量(BMD)是指与健康效应的预定反应增加量(基准反应,BMR)相对应的化学物质剂量。在本文中,研究了一种从连续剂量反应信息进行基准计算的方法(混合方法)。在该方法的制定过程中,必须确定不良健康效应的临界值。结果表明,方差对混合模型的影响取决于临界值确定方式的选择。如果将临界值确定为对应于对照分布的指定尾部比例P(0),则当方差向上偏倚时,BMD会向上偏倚。相反,如果将临界值直接确定为连续反应变量的某个水平,则当方差向下偏倚时,BMD会向上偏倚。还进行了一项模拟研究,比较了两种确定临界值方式下BMD的准确性和精密度。一般来说,考虑1%、5%和10%(额外风险)的BMR,相对于直接确定临界值的情况,当通过指定P(0)来估计临界值时,BMD的精密度会更高。在BMD估计中使用方差的最大似然估计值的平方根可能会产生一种偏差,这种偏差会因临界值公式而体现出来(如果指定P(0)则为向下偏差,如果直接指定临界值c则为向上偏差)。如果在计算中使用标准差的无偏估计量,这种特征可能会减少。

相似文献

1
Benchmark calculations in risk assessment using continuous dose-response information: the influence of variance and the determination of a cut-off value.使用连续剂量反应信息进行风险评估的基准计算:方差的影响及临界值的确定
Risk Anal. 2003 Oct;23(5):1059-68. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00381.
2
Benchmark dose calculation for ordered categorical responses.有序分类反应的基准剂量计算。
Risk Anal. 2014 Aug;34(8):1435-47. doi: 10.1111/risa.12167. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
3
Comparing experimental designs for benchmark dose calculations for continuous endpoints.比较用于连续终点基准剂量计算的实验设计。
Risk Anal. 2006 Aug;26(4):1031-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00798.x.
4
The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment.基准剂量法——现有模型综述及在健康风险评估中的应用建议。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2003;33(5):505-42.
5
An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).对动物因接触二噁英(TCDD)而产生的非癌症连续性数据健康影响的基准剂量方法学评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;40(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.04.002.
6
Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.使用聚类定性数据对基准剂量和置信限进行自助法估计。
Risk Anal. 2007 Apr;27(2):447-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00897.x.
7
Identification of a critical dose level for risk assessment: developments in benchmark dose analysis of continuous endpoints.确定用于风险评估的关键剂量水平:连续终点的基准剂量分析进展
Toxicol Sci. 2006 Mar;90(1):241-51. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfj057. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
8
Model Uncertainty and Bayesian Model Averaged Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Data.连续数据的模型不确定性与贝叶斯模型平均基准剂量估计
Risk Anal. 2014 Jan;34(1):101-20. doi: 10.1111/risa.12078. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
9
Characterizing dose-response: I: Critical assessment of the benchmark dose concept.剂量反应特征描述:I:基准剂量概念的批判性评估
Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):13-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00911.x.
10
Precision of benchmark dose estimates for continuous (nonquantal) measurements of toxic effects.毒性效应连续(非定量)测量的基准剂量估计精度。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;24(1 Pt 1):19-23. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0060.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypertension in People Exposed to Environmental Cadmium: Roles for 20-Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic Acid in the Kidney.暴露于环境镉中的人群的高血压:20-羟基二十碳四烯酸在肾脏中的作用。
J Xenobiot. 2025 Aug 1;15(4):122. doi: 10.3390/jox15040122.
2
Dose-Related Severity Sequence, and Risk-Based Integration, of Chemically Induced Health Effects.化学诱导健康效应的剂量相关严重程度序列和基于风险的综合评估。
Toxicol Sci. 2018 Sep 1;165(1):74-89. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfy124.
3
Bayesian Quantile Impairment Threshold Benchmark Dose Estimation for Continuous Endpoints.
贝叶斯分位数损伤阈值基准剂量估计用于连续终点。
Risk Anal. 2017 Nov;37(11):2107-2118. doi: 10.1111/risa.12762. Epub 2017 May 29.
4
Application of BMD approach to identify thresholds of cadmium-induced renal effect among 35 to 55 year-old women in two cadmium polluted counties in China.应用骨密度方法在中国两个镉污染县的35至55岁女性中确定镉诱导肾效应的阈值。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 4;9(2):e87817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087817. eCollection 2014.
5
Benchmark dose for cadmium-induced renal effects in humans.镉对人体肾脏影响的基准剂量。
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jul;114(7):1072-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9028.