• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陶瓷托槽的等离子弧固化:剪切粘结强度和脱粘特性评估

Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.

作者信息

Klocke Arndt, Korbmacher Heike M, Huck Lothar G, Ghosh Joydeep, Kahl-Nieke Bärbel

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Hamburg, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00310-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00310-x
PMID:12970665
Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength and debonding characteristics when a xenon plasma arc curing light is used to bond polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Brackets were bonded to 240 extracted bovine mandibular incisors with a composite adhesive. Curing intervals of 1, 3, and 6 seconds were chosen for curing with the plasma arc light, and the control group was cured at 10 seconds per bracket with a conventional halogen light. Debonding was performed on a universal testing machine and according to the bracket manufacturers' recommendations. Both the polycrystalline and the monocrystalline brackets consistently debonded at the bracket-adhesive interface, regardless of debonding method, curing interval, or curing light. No enamel fractures were observed after debonding. Bracket fractures were rare and did not affect debonding. Bond strength was significantly higher for the monocrystalline brackets (P <.0001): mean shear bond strength ranged between 9.68 +/- 2.17 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 1 sec curing interval) and 10.73 +/- 3.22 MPa (halogen light, 10 sec curing interval) for the polycrystalline brackets and between 19.85 +/- 2.97 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 1 sec curing interval) and 22.94 +/- 3.20 MPa (plasma arc curing light, 3 sec curing interval) for the monocrystalline brackets. Significant differences were also found for the curing methods used (P =.047). A curing interval of 3 seconds with the plasma arc curing light is recommended for both polycrystalline and monocrystalline ceramic brackets.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是评估使用氙气等离子弧固化灯粘结多晶和单晶陶瓷托槽时的粘结强度和脱粘特性。使用复合粘结剂将托槽粘结到240颗拔除的牛下颌切牙上。选择1秒、3秒和6秒的固化时间用等离子弧光进行固化,对照组使用传统卤素灯每颗托槽固化10秒。在万能试验机上按照托槽制造商的建议进行脱粘。无论脱粘方法、固化时间或固化灯如何,多晶和单晶托槽均始终在托槽-粘结剂界面脱粘。脱粘后未观察到釉质骨折。托槽骨折很少见,且不影响脱粘。单晶托槽的粘结强度显著更高(P<.0001):多晶托槽的平均剪切粘结强度在9.68±2.17MPa(等离子弧固化灯,1秒固化时间)和10.73±3.22MPa(卤素灯,10秒固化时间)之间,单晶托槽的平均剪切粘结强度在19.85±2.97MPa(等离子弧固化灯,1秒固化时间)和22.94±3.20MPa(等离子弧固化灯,3秒固化时间)之间。所用固化方法也存在显著差异(P =.047)。对于多晶和单晶陶瓷托槽,建议使用等离子弧固化灯固化3秒。

相似文献

1
Plasma arc curing of ceramic brackets: an evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics.陶瓷托槽的等离子弧固化:剪切粘结强度和脱粘特性评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):309-15. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00310-x.
2
Plasma arc curing lights for orthodontic bonding.用于正畸粘结的等离子弧固化灯。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Dec;122(6):643-8. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.126897.
3
Comparison of bond strength between orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasma arc curing lights: an in-vitro and in-vivo study.用卤素灯和等离子弧固化灯粘结正畸托槽的粘结强度比较:一项体外和体内研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.043.
4
Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.两种陶瓷托槽脱粘特性的评估:一项体外研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):329-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.015.
5
Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study.消毒后金属与陶瓷托槽的粘结强度:一项体外研究。
Angle Orthod. 2005 Sep;75(5):836-42. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[836:BSODMA]2.0.CO;2.
6
Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer.传统光固化与高强度光固化对复合树脂及树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀牙釉质剪切粘结强度的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jan;119(1):30-5. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.111399.
7
Effects of high-speed curing devices on shear bond strength and microleakage of orthodontic brackets.高速固化装置对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度和微渗漏的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 May;123(5):555-61. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.S0889540602000197.
8
Changes in shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel brackets with different visible light curing times and directions.不同可见光固化时间和方向下陶瓷与不锈钢托槽剪切粘结强度的变化
Aust Orthod J. 2009 Nov;25(2):153-7.
9
Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽脱粘后的失败特征及粘结强度评估:托槽基底硅烷化的影响
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):176-82. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm100. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
10
Rapid curing of bonding composite with a xenon plasma arc light.用氙等离子体弧光灯快速固化粘结复合材料。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001 Jun;119(6):610-6. doi: 10.1067/mod.2001.113652.

引用本文的文献

1
Do dental bleaching sessions prior to orthodontic treatment change the bond strength of esthetic brackets?正畸治疗前的牙齿漂白疗程会改变美学托槽的粘结强度吗?
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Aug 27;26(4):e2119124. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.4.e2119124.oar. eCollection 2021.
2
Shear Bond Strength of Rebonded Ceramic Brackets Using Four Different Methods of Adhesive Removal.使用四种不同的胶粘剂去除方法对重新粘结的陶瓷托槽进行剪切粘结强度测试。
J Dent (Tehran). 2018 Jan;15(1):54-62.
3
Effect of Dental Chair Light on Enamel Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets Using Light Cure Based Adhesive System: An In-Vitro Study.
牙科椅灯光对使用光固化粘结系统的正畸托槽釉质粘结的影响:一项体外研究。
Acta Inform Med. 2016 Oct;24(5):317-321. doi: 10.5455/aim.2016.24.317-321. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
4
Comparison of shear bond strength of plastic and ceramic brackets.塑料与陶瓷托槽剪切粘结强度的比较。
J Orofac Orthop. 2014 Sep;75(5):345-57. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0236-6. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
5
Effect of a DPSS laser on the shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with different base designs.不同基底设计的陶瓷托槽的 DPSS 激光对其剪切粘结强度的影响。
Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1461-6. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1227-8. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with halogen and plasma arc light curing.用卤素光固化和等离子弧光固化粘结正畸托槽的剪切粘结强度比较。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 May;9(3):321-7.