Dickey Barbara, Normand Sharon-Lise T, Drake Robert, Weiss Roger D, Azeni Hocine, Hanson Annette
Cambridge Hospital, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Sep;60(3):332-46. doi: 10.1177/1077558703254691.
This study tested whether a managed care policy of substituting outpatient for inpatient treatment of substance use disorders shifted treatment costs to psychiatric providers. This was an observational study, based on administrative data of 25,450 adult disabled Medicaid beneficiaries treated for schizophrenia and major affective disorders. Eighteen percent had a diagnosis of substance use disorder. Multivariate regression was used to determine the odds of having a hospital admission and the relationship of managed care to hospital length of stay and total per person treatment expenditures. Hospital admissions and length of stay for both substance use disorder and psychiatric treatment were reduced, but adults with a dual diagnosis had higher annual expenditures compared to those with only a psychiatric diagnosis. There was no evidence of cost shifting. Although emphasis on outpatient treatment did not result in cost shifting, the combination of substance use disorder and psychiatric illness remains an expensive public health problem.
本研究检验了一项将物质使用障碍的住院治疗替换为门诊治疗的管理式医疗政策是否会将治疗成本转至精神科医疗服务提供者身上。这是一项基于25450名因精神分裂症和重度情感障碍接受治疗的成年残疾医疗补助受益人的行政数据的观察性研究。18%的人被诊断患有物质使用障碍。采用多变量回归来确定住院的几率以及管理式医疗与住院时长和人均总治疗支出之间的关系。物质使用障碍和精神科治疗的住院率和住院时长均有所降低,但与仅患有精神科疾病的成年人相比,双重诊断的成年人年度支出更高。没有成本转移的证据。虽然对门诊治疗的重视并未导致成本转移,但物质使用障碍和精神疾病并存仍是一个昂贵的公共卫生问题。