Suppr超能文献

利用行政数据进行纵向药物滥用研究。

Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research.

作者信息

Evans Elizabeth, Grella Christine E, Murphy Debra A, Hser Yih-Ing

机构信息

UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):252-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9125-3. Epub 2008 Aug 5.

Abstract

The utilization of administrative data in substance abuse research has become more widespread than ever. This selective review synthesizes recent extant research from 31 articles to consider what has been learned from using administrative data to conduct longitudinal substance abuse research in four overlapping areas: (1) service access and utilization, (2) underrepresented populations, (3) treatment outcomes, and (4) cost analysis. Despite several notable limitations, administrative data contribute valuable information, particularly in the investigation of service system interactions and outcomes among substance abusers as they unfold and influence each other over the long term. This critical assessment of the advantages and disadvantages of using existing administrative data within a longitudinal framework should stimulate innovative thinking regarding future applications of administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research purposes.

摘要

行政数据在药物滥用研究中的应用比以往任何时候都更加广泛。这篇选择性综述综合了31篇文章中最近的现有研究,以探讨在四个重叠领域使用行政数据进行纵向药物滥用研究所学到的内容:(1)服务获取与利用;(2)代表性不足的人群;(3)治疗结果;(4)成本分析。尽管存在一些显著的局限性,但行政数据提供了有价值的信息,特别是在调查药物滥用者之间服务系统的相互作用以及随着时间推移它们如何相互影响和发展方面。对在纵向框架内使用现有行政数据的优缺点进行的这一关键评估,应能激发关于行政数据未来在纵向药物滥用研究中的应用的创新思维。

相似文献

1
Using administrative data for longitudinal substance abuse research.利用行政数据进行纵向药物滥用研究。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;37(2):252-71. doi: 10.1007/s11414-008-9125-3. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
2
Selecting data sources for substance abuse services research.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Jan;22(1):11-22. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(01)00208-2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Outcomes, performance, and quality: what's the difference?结果、绩效与质量:有何区别?
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Jun;32(4):331-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
6
California drug courts: outcomes, costs and promising practices: an overview of Phase II in a statewide study.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2006 Nov;Suppl 3:345-56. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2006.10400598.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验