• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过判别分析筛查恶性胸腔积液

Screening of malignant pleural effusion by discriminant analysis.

作者信息

Carrión-Valero F, Perpiñá-Tordera M, Sanchis-Aldás J

机构信息

Service of Pneumology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9):892-8.

PMID:12971675
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of discriminant analysis as a method of optimizing the discriminant power of routine parameters in differentiating between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusions.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the medical records of 245 patients with exudative pleural effusion.

RESULTS

The most powerful predictor of the malignant etiology of pleural effusion was a function that consisted of seven variables: age (years); effusion volume (coded as up to one third = 1, up to two thirds = 2, massive = 3); sedimentation rate (mm/h); monocyte count in the peripheral blood (cells/mm3); bloodstained exudate (coded as yes = 1, no = 2); and glucose (mg/dL) and iron (microg/dL) concentration in pleural fluid. This function showed a sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 76%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 86%, and was able to give an 82% rate of correct classification. In patients aged 50 years or younger, the NPV ranged between 91 and 98%, whereas in those older than 60 years, the PPV was 89%.

CONCLUSION

The calculated discriminant function is a simple, rapid, and inexpensive method for screening patients with pleural effusion for malignant etiology.

摘要

目的

评估判别分析作为一种优化常规参数判别能力以区分恶性和非恶性胸腔积液的方法的价值。

方法

回顾性分析245例渗出性胸腔积液患者的病历。

结果

胸腔积液恶性病因的最强预测指标是一个由七个变量组成的函数:年龄(岁);积液量(编码为至多三分之一 = 1,至多三分之二 = 2,大量 = 3);血沉(mm/h);外周血单核细胞计数(细胞/mm³);血性渗出液(编码为是 = 1,否 = 2);以及胸腔积液中的葡萄糖(mg/dL)和铁(μg/dL)浓度。该函数的敏感性为77%,特异性为85%,阳性预测值(PPV)为76%,阴性预测值(NPV)为86%,正确分类率为82%。在50岁及以下的患者中,NPV在91%至98%之间,而在60岁以上的患者中,PPV为89%。

结论

计算得到的判别函数是一种简单、快速且廉价的方法,用于筛查胸腔积液患者的恶性病因。

相似文献

1
Screening of malignant pleural effusion by discriminant analysis.通过判别分析筛查恶性胸腔积液
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Sep;7(9):892-8.
2
Screening of tuberculous pleural effusion by discriminant analysis.通过判别分析筛查结核性胸腔积液
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001 Jul;5(7):673-9.
3
Differentiating tuberculous from malignant pleural effusions: a scoring model.鉴别结核性与恶性胸腔积液:一种评分模型。
Med Sci Monit. 2003 May;9(5):CR175-80.
4
[Pleural effusions--experience of Pneumo-phtisiology Hospital Tudor Vladimirescu--I: Clinical study].[胸腔积液——图多尔·弗拉迪米雷斯库肺结核病医院的经验——I:临床研究]
Pneumologia. 2008 Jul-Sep;57(3):138-46.
5
A decision tree for differentiating tuberculous from malignant pleural effusions.用于区分结核性与恶性胸腔积液的决策树。
Respir Med. 2008 Aug;102(8):1159-64. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
6
Differentiating between malignant and idiopathic pleural effusions: the value of diagnostic procedures.鉴别恶性胸腔积液和特发性胸腔积液:诊断程序的价值
QJM. 2007 Jun;100(6):351-9. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcm032.
7
Tumor type M2-pyruvate-kinase levels in pleural fluid versus plasma in cancer patients: a further tool to define the need for invasive procedures.癌症患者胸腔积液与血浆中肿瘤类型M2丙酮酸激酶水平:确定是否需要进行侵入性检查的又一工具
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Apr;33(4):723-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Feb 7.
8
[Evaluation of atrial natriuretic peptide in differentiating benign and malignant pleural effusion].
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 1999 Mar;22(3):147-9.
9
A simple C-reactive protein measurement for the differentiation between tuberculous and malignant pleural effusion.一种用于鉴别结核性和恶性胸腔积液的简单C反应蛋白检测方法。
Respirology. 2004 Mar;9(1):66-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2003.00521.x.
10
Differentiation between malignant and non-malignant pleural effusion.
Eur J Respir Dis. 1985 Nov;67(5):326-34.