• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用LightSpeed旋转器械和Gates-Glidden扩孔钻制备的下颌磨牙近中根中的剩余牙本质厚度。

Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.

作者信息

Zuckerman Offer, Katz Alexander, Pilo Raphael, Tamse Aviad, Fuss Zvi

机构信息

The Maurice and Gabriela Goldshleger School of Dental Medicien, Tel Aviv Universisty, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Sep;96(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(02)91710-5.

DOI:10.1016/s1079-2104(02)91710-5
PMID:12973293
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to measure the residual dentin thickness (RDT) in the mesial roots of mandibular molars after instrumentation with Lightspeed and Gates-Glidden rotary instruments. Study design Thirty extracted, untreated human mesial roots of mandibular molars were separated from the distal roots and embedded in clear polyester resin. The roots were cut horizontally at 1, 4, and 7 mm short of the anatomic apex. The diameter of each mesiobuccal canal was measured by using a stereo measuring microscope at each level in the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. The dentin thickness was measured in each level in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual directions. Sections were reassembled with a muffle. The canals were enlarged to the working length with Lightspeed rotary instruments, of which the average size used was a No. 50 file. The coronal third was flared with No. 2 Gates-Glidden reamers. Slices were separated again, and the RDT and canal diameters were measured.

RESULTS

The minimal measured RDT after instrumentation at the 1-, 4-, and 7-mm levels was 0.70 +/- 0.28 mm, 1.04 +/- 0.18 mm, and 1.09 +/- 0.19 mm, respectively. The average diameter of the canals after instrumentation at the 1-, 4-, and 7-mm levels was 0.50 +/- 0.04 mm, 0.52 +/- 0.05 mm, and 0.74 +/- 0.08 mm, respectively. The canal diameter did not exceed one third of the root diameter at all levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Root canal preparation of mandibular mesial roots with Lightspeed instruments to No. 50 in the apical third and Gates-Glidden reamers to No. 2 in the coronal third does not significantly decrease the RDT.

摘要

目的

我们试图测量使用LightSpeed和Gates - Glidden旋转器械进行根管预备后下颌磨牙近中根的剩余牙本质厚度(RDT)。

研究设计

将30颗拔除的、未经处理的人下颌磨牙近中根与远中根分离,并嵌入透明聚酯树脂中。在距离解剖根尖1、4和7毫米处水平切断牙根。使用立体测量显微镜在每个水平的颊舌向和近远中向测量每个近中颊根管的直径。在近中、远中、颊侧和舌侧方向的每个水平测量牙本质厚度。切片用马弗炉重新组装。使用LightSpeed旋转器械将根管扩大至工作长度,所使用的平均型号为50号锉。冠部三分之一用2号Gates - Glidden扩孔钻扩开。再次分离切片,并测量RDT和根管直径。

结果

在1毫米、4毫米和7毫米水平进行根管预备后测得的最小RDT分别为0.70±0.28毫米、1.04±0.18毫米和1.09±0.19毫米。在1毫米、4毫米和7毫米水平进行根管预备后根管的平均直径分别为0.50±0.04毫米、0.52±0.05毫米和0.74±0.08毫米。在所有水平根管直径均未超过根直径的三分之一。

结论

使用LightSpeed器械将下颌近中根根尖三分之一预备至50号,冠部三分之一用2号Gates - Glidden扩孔钻进行根管预备,不会显著降低RDT。

相似文献

1
Residual dentin thickness in mesial roots of mandibular molars prepared with Lightspeed rotary instruments and Gates-Glidden reamers.使用LightSpeed旋转器械和Gates-Glidden扩孔钻制备的下颌磨牙近中根中的剩余牙本质厚度。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Sep;96(3):351-5. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(02)91710-5.
2
Influence of cervical preflaring on determination of apical file size in mandibular molars: SEM analysis.下颌磨牙中宫颈预扩对根尖锉大小确定的影响:扫描电镜分析
Braz Dent J. 2008;19(3):245-51. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402008000300013.
3
Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.使用多层计算机断层扫描比较ProTaper、HeroShaper和Gates Glidden钻针对颈段牙本质厚度和根管容积的影响。
J Endod. 2008 Oct;34(10):1219-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.06.022. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
4
Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.使用手动和旋转器械制备的下颌前磨牙的剩余牙本质厚度。
J Endod. 1998 Jun;24(6):401-4. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80020-4.
5
The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.使用手动和旋转器械按照基于初始根尖锉尺寸的特定扩大标准进行根尖根管预备的质量。
J Endod. 2002 Sep;28(9):658-64. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200209000-00008.
6
Comparison of dentine removal using V-taper and K-Flexofile instruments.比较 V 型和 K 型 Flexofile 器械去除牙本质的效果。
Int Endod J. 2010 Nov;43(11):1029-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01769.x.
7
The impact of post space preparation with Gates-Glidden drills on residual dentin thickness in distal roots of mandibular molars.使用盖茨-格利登钻进行根管预备后对下颌磨牙远中根剩余牙本质厚度的影响。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul;135(7):903-9. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0336.
8
Comparison of the remaining dentin thickness in the root after hand and four rotary instrumentation techniques: an in vitro study.手动及四种旋转器械预备技术后牙根剩余牙本质厚度的比较:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013 Jul 1;14(4):712-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1389.
9
Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.传统旋转器械和自调整锉在下颌磨牙近中根管系统中产生的硬组织碎屑堆积。
Int Endod J. 2012 May;45(5):413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01991.x. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with gates glidden and ParaPost drills.使用盖茨钻针和帕罗派斯特钻针制备的下颌前磨牙的剩余牙本质厚度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jun;83(6):617-23.

引用本文的文献

1
A micro- computed tomographic study of the anatomic danger zone in mesial roots of permanent mandibular first and second molars.一项关于恒牙下颌第一和第二磨牙近中根解剖危险区的显微计算机断层扫描研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Feb 24;25(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05675-2.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Efficiencies of Different Rotary File Systems in Terms of Remaining Dentin Thickness Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: An In Vitro Study.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描术比较不同旋转锉系统在剩余牙本质厚度方面的效率:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jun 3;16(6):e61566. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61566. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Evaluation of Radicular Dentin Thickness in Maxillary and Mandibular Central Incisor, Canine, and Premolar Teeth.
上颌和下颌中切牙、尖牙及前磨牙牙根牙本质厚度的评估
Cureus. 2024 Mar 26;16(3):e56974. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56974. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Evaluation of Dentine Structure Loss after Separated File Retrieval by Three Different Techniques: An Ex-vivo Study.三种不同技术分离器械取出后牙本质结构丧失的评估:一项离体研究。
Eur Endod J. 2023 May;8(3):225-230. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.37929.
5
Dentine Thickness of Second Mesibuccal Canals in First Maxillary Molars Prepared with Rotary Instruments.用旋转器械预备的上颌第一磨牙近中颊根第二根管的牙本质厚度
Iran Endod J. 2022 Summer;17(3):126-131. doi: 10.22037/iej.v17i3.35487.
6
Evaluation of Root Dentin Thickness and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Two Novel Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments - An Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscopy Study.两种新型镍钛旋转器械的根管牙本质厚度及玷污层去除效果评估——一项锥形束计算机断层扫描和扫描电子显微镜研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1628-S1632. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_346_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
7
Evaluation of microcrack formation during root canal preparation using hand, rotary files and self-adjusting file in primary teeth: An in vitro study.使用手动器械、旋转锉和自调式锉对乳牙进行根管预备时微裂纹形成的评估:一项体外研究。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021 Winter;15(1):35-41. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2021.007. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
8
Influence of cervical preflaring and root canal preparation on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.颈部预扩和根管预备对根管治疗后牙齿抗折性的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Apr 16;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-1050-8.
9
The Effect of Gates-Glidden Drills on the Quality of Root Canal Treatment by Pre-Clinical Dental Students.Gates-Glidden钻针对临床前牙科学生根管治疗质量的影响。
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 23;6(11):2193-2197. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.463. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
10
Cervical Dentin Changes in Curved Root Canals after Using WaveOne and Reciproc Files with Full Rotation versus Reciprocation Movement: An Study.使用WaveOne和全旋转与往复运动的Reciproc锉后弯曲根管内的颈段牙本质变化:一项研究
Contemp Clin Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):357-362. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_422_17.