Reddy Gangili Sparsha, Kalaiselvam Rajeswari, Rajakumaran Arasappan, Kuzhanchinathan Manigandan, Sabarish Ram, Ganesh Arathi
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Periodontics, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Nov;13(Suppl 2):S1628-S1632. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_346_21. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
This study aimed to compare the two nickel-titanium (NiTi) instruments on root dentin thickness using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ability to remove the smear layer using scanning electron microscope (SEM).
The effect of two NiTi rotary instruments such as XP Endo shaper and ProTaper Gold (PTG) in retaining adequate dentin thickness and debridement (i.e., removal of smear layer) was evaluated using CBCT and SEM. After cleaning and shaping of the root canal with adequate irrigation, the effect of two NiTi instrument systems at 3 mm (apical), 6 mm (middle), and 9 mm (coronal) levels on buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal aspects in terms of amount of dentin removal and smear layer removal was evaluated. The data were analyzed using student's unpaired -test with a significance of ≤ 0.05.
Both NiTi instrument systems had no statistically significant difference in amount of dentin removal at all three levels and on all four aspects. In smear layer removal, PTG had significantly better efficacy compared to XP Endo shaper at the coronal third of root canal.
Instrumentation with XP Endo Shaper and PTG showed a similar amount of dentin removal. PTG has a significant effect on smear layer removal compared to XP Endo Shaper only at the coronal third of root canal.
本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)比较两种镍钛(NiTi)器械对根管牙本质厚度的影响,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)比较它们去除玷污层的能力。
使用CBCT和SEM评估两种镍钛旋转器械,即XP Endo Shaper和ProTaper Gold(PTG)在保留足够牙本质厚度和清创(即去除玷污层)方面的效果。在对根管进行充分冲洗的清洁和预备后,评估两种镍钛器械系统在根尖3mm、根管中部6mm和冠部9mm水平处,在颊侧、舌侧、近中侧和远中侧的牙本质去除量和玷污层去除情况。使用学生非配对t检验分析数据,显著性水平设定为≤0.05。
两种镍钛器械系统在所有三个水平和所有四个方面的牙本质去除量上均无统计学显著差异。在玷污层去除方面,在根管冠部三分之一处,PTG的效果明显优于XP Endo Shaper。
使用XP Endo Shaper和PTG进行根管预备时,牙本质去除量相似。与XP Endo Shaper相比,PTG仅在根管冠部三分之一处对玷污层去除有显著效果。