Suppr超能文献

人类基因组计划——威胁还是希望?

The Human Genome Project--threat or promise?

作者信息

Carmichael B

机构信息

Southend Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003 Oct;47(Pt 7):505-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00528.x.

Abstract

This paper reflects on some of the arguments against screening from the perspective of a relative of individuals with Fragile X syndrome. It proposes to think about intellectual disability (ID) as including a wide range of limitations beyond that of only the mental handicap. It argues that these limitations impose conditions upon both people with disabilities and their parents, as well as upon their siblings, that in various ways amount to suffering. The claim that people with disabilities are enriching the lives of their relatives is rejected. Furthermore, it is argued that those who ascribe a high moral status to people with disabilities tend to neglect that society does not make much of an effort to offer the necessary support to materialize this status. The claim that screening negatively affects the moral status of persons with ID is rebutted on grounds of the freedom of choice.

摘要

本文从脆性X综合征患者亲属的角度,对一些反对筛查的观点进行了反思。它提议将智力残疾(ID)视为包括广泛的局限性,而不仅仅是智力障碍。文章认为,这些局限性给残疾人和他们的父母以及兄弟姐妹都带来了种种条件,在不同方面都相当于痛苦。那种认为残疾人丰富了其亲属生活的说法遭到了驳斥。此外,文章指出,那些赋予残疾人较高道德地位的人往往忽视了社会并没有做出太多努力来提供必要的支持以实现这种地位。基于选择自由的理由,反驳了筛查会对智力残疾者的道德地位产生负面影响这一说法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验