Steinbach William J, Stevens David A, Denning David W
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Oct 1;37 Suppl 3:S188-224. doi: 10.1086/376524.
The development of newer antifungal drugs is creating new potential combination therapies to combat the dismal mortality rate associated with invasive aspergillosis (IA). The efficacy of combination therapy for IA has not been established; sparse data on combination or sequential antifungal therapy depict interactions ranging from synergy to antagonism. We reviewed data from all published in vitro studies, animal model studies, and clinical reports and recent abstracts on combination and sequential antifungal therapy for IA from 1966-2001. Among cases of IA during 1966-2001, 249 were treated with 23 different antifungal combinations. Amphotericin B plus 5-fluorocytosine was the most commonly used (49% of cases), followed by amphotericin B plus itraconazole (16%) or plus rifampin (11%). Combination therapy resulted in improvement in 63% of patients, generally with amphotericin B plus 5-fluorocytosine or rifampin and indifference with amphotericin B plus itraconazole. In 27 in vitro reports, we found synergy (in 36% of reports), additivity (in 24%), indifference (in 28%), and antagonism (in 11%). Amphotericin B plus 5-fluorocytosine and amphotericin B plus rifampin showed generally positive interactions and amphotericin B plus itraconazole showed results that were largely indifferent. Eighteen animal model reports demonstrated synergy (in 14% of reports), additivity (in 20%), indifference (in 51%), and antagonism (in 14%). In general, amphotericin B plus 5-fluorocytosine, amphotericin B plus rifampin, and amphotericin B plus itraconazole showed indifferent results, whereas amphotericin B plus micafungin showed positive interactions. Thirty-four cases treated during 1990-2001 with sequential therapy, excluding amphotericin B followed by itraconazole, showed improvement in 68% of cases. Improvement was noted with amphotericin B or itraconazole followed by voriconazole but not with itraconazole followed by amphotericin B.
新型抗真菌药物的研发正在催生新的潜在联合疗法,以应对与侵袭性曲霉病(IA)相关的令人沮丧的死亡率。IA联合疗法的疗效尚未确定;关于联合或序贯抗真菌治疗的数据稀少,显示出从协同到拮抗的各种相互作用。我们回顾了1966年至2001年间所有已发表的体外研究、动物模型研究以及关于IA联合和序贯抗真菌治疗的临床报告及近期摘要中的数据。在1966年至2001年期间的IA病例中,249例接受了23种不同的抗真菌联合治疗。两性霉素B加5-氟胞嘧啶是最常用的(占病例的49%),其次是两性霉素B加伊曲康唑(16%)或加利福平(11%)。联合治疗使63%的患者病情得到改善,一般是两性霉素B加5-氟胞嘧啶或利福平,而两性霉素B加伊曲康唑则效果不明显。在27篇体外研究报告中,我们发现协同作用(占报告的36%)、相加作用(24%)、无作用(28%)和拮抗作用(11%)。两性霉素B加5-氟胞嘧啶和两性霉素B加利福平通常显示出积极的相互作用,而两性霉素B加伊曲康唑的结果大多不明显。18篇动物模型报告显示协同作用(占报告的14%)、相加作用(20%)、无作用(51%)和拮抗作用(14%)。总体而言,两性霉素B加5-氟胞嘧啶,两性霉素B加利福平,以及两性霉素B加伊曲康唑显示出不明显的结果,而两性霉素B加米卡芬净显示出积极的相互作用。1990年至2001年期间接受序贯治疗的34例病例(不包括两性霉素B后接伊曲康唑)中,68%的病例病情得到改善。两性霉素B或伊曲康唑后接伏立康唑病情有改善,但伊曲康唑后接两性霉素B则不然。