• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用粘结树脂水门汀将镍铬合金粘结到牙齿结构上。

Bonding Ni-Cr alloy to tooth structure with adhesive resin cements.

作者信息

Penugonda B, Scherer W, Cooper H, Kokoletsos N, Koifman V

机构信息

Department of Comprehensive Care and Applied Practice Administration, New York University College of Dentistry, NY.

出版信息

J Esthet Dent. 1992;4 Suppl:26-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00714.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00714.x
PMID:1298320
Abstract

This study was to determine the shear bond strengths of Ni-Cr alloy to Ni-Cr alloy (Group I), Ni-Cr alloy to enamel (Group II), and Ni-Cr alloy to dentin (Group III) using Imperva Dual, DC Metabond, All-Bond, Geristore, and Panavia. All bonded specimens were thermocycled 2000 x (5 degrees C-55 degrees C) after 24 hours and subjected to shear bond testing on a Universal Instron Testing Machine. In all groups of the study, Imperva Dual and CB Metabond had significantly (p < .05) higher bond values than Panavia.

摘要

本研究旨在使用Imperva Dual、DC Metabond、All-Bond、Geristore和Panavia测定镍铬合金与镍铬合金(第一组)、镍铬合金与牙釉质(第二组)以及镍铬合金与牙本质(第三组)之间的剪切粘结强度。所有粘结标本在24小时后进行2000次(5摄氏度至55摄氏度)热循环,并在万能英斯特朗试验机上进行剪切粘结测试。在该研究的所有组中,Imperva Dual和CB Metabond的粘结值显著高于Panavia(p <.05)。

相似文献

1
Bonding Ni-Cr alloy to tooth structure with adhesive resin cements.使用粘结树脂水门汀将镍铬合金粘结到牙齿结构上。
J Esthet Dent. 1992;4 Suppl:26-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00714.x.
2
Bonding composite to glass ionomer with adhesive resin cements.
J Esthet Dent. 1992;4 Suppl:13-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00711.x.
3
Shear bond strengths of resin adhesive cements to dentin and Ni-Cr-Be alloy.树脂粘结水门汀与牙本质及镍铬铍合金的剪切粘结强度。
J Esthet Dent. 1992 Jul-Aug;4(4):117-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1992.tb00677.x.
4
Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.五种粘结剂与两种CAD-CAM修复材料及牙釉质的拉伸粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Jul;90(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00217-8.
5
Bond strength of adhesive composites to dental substrates.牙科用粘结性复合材料与牙体组织的粘结强度
J Prosthodont. 1994 Sep;3(3):126-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1994.tb00141.x.
6
Bond strength of an adhesive resin system with various dental substrates.一种粘结树脂系统与各种牙科基底的粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Nov;74(5):463-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80346-4.
7
The potential for bonding titanium restorations.
J Prosthodont. 1993 Sep;2(3):151-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00399.x.
8
Shear bond strengths of three resin cements used with three adhesive primers for metal.三种用于金属的树脂水门汀与三种粘结剂底涂剂配合使用时的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):254-61. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90481-3.
9
Shear bond strengths of four resin cements to cobalt-chromium alloy.
Am J Dent. 1995 Dec;8(6):285-8.
10
A comparison of the tensile strength of four prosthodontic adhesives.
J Prosthodont. 1993 Dec;2(4):215-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1993.tb00412.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of microleakage and penetration depth of ACP containing pit and fissure sealant and flowable composite - An study.含ACP窝沟封闭剂与流动复合树脂的微渗漏及渗透深度的比较评估——一项研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Aug 1;16(8):e1027-e1032. doi: 10.4317/jced.61756. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Evaluation of Marginal Microleakage and Depth of Penetration of Different Materials Used as Pit and Fissure Sealants: An Study.不同材料用作窝沟封闭剂时的边缘微渗漏及渗透深度评估:一项研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):38-42. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1742.
3
Comparative Evaluation of the Marginal Sealing Ability of two Commercially Available Pit and Fissure Sealants.
两种市售窝沟封闭剂边缘封闭能力的比较评价
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):ZC01-ZC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19996.8413. Epub 2016 Sep 1.