Recommendations for pacing.
作者信息
Channon K M, Cripps T R, Ormerod O
出版信息
BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1431; author reply 1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1431-a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Recommendations for pacing.起搏建议。
BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1431; author reply 1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1431-a.
2
Recommendations for pacing.起搏建议。
BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1431-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1431-b.
3
Recommendations for pacing.起搏建议。
BMJ. 1992 Dec 5;305(6866):1432. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1432.
4
Issues in cardiac pacing: can agism be justified?心脏起搏的问题：年龄歧视是否合理？
Br Heart J. 1994 Aug;72(2):102-3. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.2.102.
5
Potential costs of cardiac re-synchronisation therapy for chronic heart failure in Scotland.苏格兰慢性心力衰竭心脏再同步治疗的潜在成本。
Scott Med J. 2005 Nov;50(4):179-80. doi: 10.1177/003693300505000415.
6
Reimbursement for cardiac pacing.心脏起搏器的报销。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Jul;15(7):1091-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb03104.x.
7
Cost implications of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group's recommendations for pacing.英国起搏与电生理学会起搏建议的成本影响
BMJ. 1992 Oct 10;305(6858):861-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6858.861.
8
Report of the policy conference on pacemaker reuse sponsored by the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.由北美起搏与电生理学会主办的起搏器再利用政策会议报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Mar;5(3):808-10. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80417-4.
9
What costs matter? Rethinking social costs of new device technologies.哪些成本至关重要？重新思考新设备技术的社会成本。
Europace. 2013 Nov;15(11):1538-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut139. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
10
Yes to cardiac devices. But at what cost?心脏设备可行。但代价是什么呢？
Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):313-4. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus407. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
引用本文的文献
1
Trends in pacemaker mode prescription 1984-1994: a single centre study of 3710 patients.1984 - 1994年起搏器模式处方趋势：对3710例患者的单中心研究
Heart. 1996 May;75(5):518-21. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.5.518.
2
Who needs dual chamber pacing?谁需要双腔起搏？
BMJ. 1993 Jul 24;307(6898):215-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6898.215.
3
Early complications of permanent pacemaker implantation: no difference between dual and single chamber systems.永久性起搏器植入的早期并发症：双腔和单腔系统之间无差异。
Br Heart J. 1995 Jun;73(6):571-5. doi: 10.1136/hrt.73.6.571.
本文引用的文献
1
Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.DDD起搏器患者中VVI起搏与DDD起搏的临床及血流动力学比较
Am J Cardiol. 1988 Feb 1;61(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90938-1.
2
Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.病态窦房结综合征中双腔起搏的益处。
Br Heart J. 1988 Oct;60(4):338-47. doi: 10.1136/hrt.60.4.338.
3
"Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.“亚临床”起搏器综合征：对无症状的心室按需（VVI）起搏器升级为双腔起搏器患者的一项随机研究。
Br Heart J. 1992 Jan;67(1):57-64. doi: 10.1136/hrt.67.1.57.
4
Impact of the recommendations of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group on pacemaker prescription and on the immediate costs of pacing in the Northern Region.英国起搏与电生理学会小组的建议对起搏器处方及北部地区起搏直接成本的影响
Br Heart J. 1992 Nov;68(5):531-4. doi: 10.1136/hrt.68.11.531.
5
Female streetworking prostitution and HIV infection in Glasgow.格拉斯哥街头女性性工作与艾滋病毒感染
BMJ. 1992 Oct 3;305(6857):801-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6857.801.
Zotero 插件