Aggarwal R K, Ray S G, Connelly D T, Coulshed D S, Charles R G
Department of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool.
Heart. 1996 May;75(5):518-21. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.5.518.
To evaluate trends in pacemaker mode prescription from 1984 to 1994 with particular reference to the changes in pacemaker mode prescription for patients aged 80 years and older at implant.
Prospective evaluation of indications for pacing and pacemaker mode prescription in all patients undergoing new pacemaker implantation from 1992 to 1994. Comparison with retrospectively obtained data for patients paced from 1984 to 1991.
Tertiary referral cardiothoracic centre.
Group 1: 2622 patients paced at one centre and entered into the national pacing database from 1984 to 1991. Group 2: 1088 consecutive patients paced from 1992 to 1994.
Use of atrial (AAI) and dual chamber (DDD) pacemakers increased progressively in patients of all ages from 1984 to 1994. There was an increase in the proportion of patients aged 80 years and older from 25.4% (group 1) to 40.5% (group 2). Patients of all ages in group 2 were more likely to receive DDD units for atrioventricular block (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) (CI) 9.0 (7.0 to 11.5)) and AAI or DDD units for sinus node disease (odds ratio (95% CI) 11.0 (7.7 to 15.8)) than those in group 1. Elderly patients (age > or = 80 at implant) with atrioventricular block or sinus node disease and a suitable atrial rhythm were less likely to receive DDD or AAI pacemakers than younger patients in both groups.
Use of atrial and dual chamber pacing modes has increased substantially in patients of all ages over the last decade. Although elderly patients represent an increasing proportion of the paced population, they remain less likely to receive atrial or dual chamber pacemakers than younger patients.
评估1984年至1994年起搏器模式处方的趋势,尤其关注植入时年龄在80岁及以上患者的起搏器模式处方变化。
对1992年至1994年所有接受新起搏器植入的患者的起搏适应证和起搏器模式处方进行前瞻性评估。与1984年至1991年起搏患者的回顾性数据进行比较。
三级转诊心胸中心。
第1组:1984年至1991年在一个中心起搏并录入国家起搏数据库的2622例患者。第2组:1992年至1994年连续起搏的1088例患者。
从1984年至1994年,各年龄段患者使用心房(AAI)和双腔(DDD)起搏器的比例逐渐增加。80岁及以上患者的比例从25.4%(第1组)增至40.5%(第2组)。与第1组相比,第2组各年龄段患者因房室传导阻滞接受DDD起搏器的可能性更大(优势比(95%置信区间)(CI)9.0(7.0至11.5)),因窦房结疾病接受AAI或DDD起搏器的可能性更大(优势比(95%CI)11.0(7.7至15.8))。两组中,植入时年龄≥80岁、患有房室传导阻滞或窦房结疾病且有合适心房节律的老年患者比年轻患者接受DDD或AAI起搏器的可能性更小。
在过去十年中,各年龄段患者使用心房和双腔起搏模式的比例大幅增加。尽管老年患者在起搏人群中所占比例不断增加,但与年轻患者相比,他们接受心房或双腔起搏器的可能性仍然较小。