Ng J, Yun H L
Department of Neonatology, Singapore General Hospital.
J Singapore Paediatr Soc. 1992;34(1-2):1-5.
Early identification and rehabilitation of hearing impairment is important for development of language in affected children. Behavioural audiological tests in children are unreliable. Brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) although a reliable objective test, is difficult to perform. Otoacoustic emissions (OAE) is now thought to be a more practicable screening modality. A study to compare the use of OAE and BAER in the paediatric population was thus undertaken. 100 children underwent OAE and BAER screening in SGH from August 1991 to February 1992. OAE was equally effective when compared with the BAER in testing for passed or failed subjects (p < 0.05, X2 = 4.9). The sensitivity and specificity of OAE with respect to BAER was 95% and 93% respectively. Mean test time was 3.1 minutes for OAE and 28.6 minutes for BAER. Success rate for OAE was 100%. We therefore conclude that OAE is a feasible alternative to the BAER as a hearing screening modality.
早期识别和治疗听力障碍对受影响儿童的语言发展至关重要。儿童的行为听力测试不可靠。脑干听觉诱发电位(BAER)虽然是一种可靠的客观测试,但操作困难。耳声发射(OAE)现在被认为是一种更可行的筛查方式。因此,开展了一项比较OAE和BAER在儿科人群中应用的研究。1991年8月至1992年2月期间,100名儿童在新加坡总医院接受了OAE和BAER筛查。在测试受试者是否通过方面,OAE与BAER同样有效(p < 0.05,X2 = 4.9)。相对于BAER,OAE的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和93%。OAE的平均测试时间为3.1分钟,BAER为28.6分钟。OAE的成功率为100%。因此,我们得出结论,作为一种听力筛查方式,OAE是BAER的可行替代方法。