Wilson D R, Honrath U
J Clin Invest. 1976 Feb;57(2):380-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI108289.
To study the role of circulating natriuretic factors in the postobstructive diuresis that occurs after relief of bilateral, but not unilateral ureteral ligation, cross-circulation was carried out between normal recipient rats and donor rats have either 24-h bilateral (BUL) or unilateral (UUL) ureteral ligation. With BUL donors, there was a rapid marked increase in sodium and water excretion in the recipient rats, sustained for 80-140 min, with a peak approximately 10 times control values. With UUL donors, no significant natriuretic response occurred. Changes in glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, blood pressure, hematocrit, or circulating levels of aldosterone or Pitressin did not explain the diuresis-natriuresis produced by cross-circulation with BUL donors. Differences in the intrinsic renal damage produced by bilateral as compared to unilateral ureteral obstruction did not appear to account for this response, since UUL donors given an acute urea load and urine reinfusion caused a similar diuresis-natriuresis. Moreover, normal donor rats given a urea load also caused a diuresis-natriuresis nearly equal to that produced by BUL rats, and the relationship between increased urea excretion and sodium excretion or urine flow in the recipients was not different in the two groups. Total urine reinfusion for 3 h in donor rats produced a significant, although less marked, diuresis-natriuresis in recipient animals, with only a slight elevation of the blood urea nitrogen level, much less increase in urea excretion rate, and no significant relationship between urea excretion and sodium excretion or urine flow. The results indicate that potent natriuretic factors, which act by decreasing the tubular reabsorption of sodium and water, are present in the blood of rats with bilateral, but not unilateral, ureteral ligation. High blood and urine urea levels appear to be the factors responsible for the marked natriuresis-diuresis occurring in normal rats during cross-circulation with BUL donors, although suggestive evidence of other natriuretic factors in urine reinfused intravenously was also obtained. The data suggest that urea osmotic diuresis is an important mechanism for determining the striking difference between the postobstructive diuresis observed after relief of bilateral as compared to unilateral ureteral ligation.
为研究循环利钠因子在双侧(而非单侧)输尿管结扎解除后发生的梗阻后利尿中的作用,对正常受体大鼠与已进行24小时双侧(BUL)或单侧(UUL)输尿管结扎的供体大鼠进行了交叉循环实验。对于BUL供体,受体大鼠的钠和水排泄迅速显著增加,持续80 - 140分钟,峰值约为对照值的10倍。对于UUL供体,未出现明显的利钠反应。肾小球滤过率、肾血浆流量、血压、血细胞比容或醛固酮或抗利尿激素的循环水平变化均无法解释与BUL供体交叉循环所产生的利尿 - 利钠作用。双侧输尿管梗阻与单侧输尿管梗阻所导致的肾脏内在损伤差异似乎并不能解释这种反应,因为给UUL供体急性输注尿素并回输尿液会引起类似的利尿 - 利钠作用。此外,给正常供体大鼠输注尿素也会引起几乎与BUL大鼠所产生的利尿 - 利钠作用相当的反应,且两组中受体大鼠尿素排泄增加与钠排泄或尿量之间的关系并无差异。在供体大鼠中进行3小时的全尿回输,受体动物会出现显著(尽管程度较轻)的利尿 - 利钠作用,此时血尿素氮水平仅有轻微升高,尿素排泄率增加较少,且尿素排泄与钠排泄或尿量之间无显著关系。结果表明,通过降低肾小管对钠和水的重吸收起作用的强效利钠因子存在于双侧(而非单侧)输尿管结扎大鼠的血液中。高血尿素和尿尿素水平似乎是与BUL供体交叉循环期间正常大鼠中显著的利钠 - 利尿作用的原因,尽管静脉回输尿液中存在其他利钠因子的提示性证据也已获得。数据表明,尿素渗透性利尿是决定双侧输尿管结扎解除后与单侧输尿管结扎后观察到的梗阻后利尿显著差异的重要机制。